Difference between revisions of "Talk:Global Commission for Post-Pandemic Policy"
(Proposal for an important new semantic property) |
|||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
would be nearer the mark. This then raises the question of how to record the disproportionate number(4?) of [[Rhodes Scholars]] in the group. I don't see any properties designed for this, or which could be easily stretched to include it. So a new [[property]] would seem to be justified. Suggestions on what to name it are welcome, as are instances where it could be applied. For example [[COVID-19/Perpetrators]] has this relationship to the [[WEF/YGL]], [[WEF/GLT]] and the [[Bilderberg]]. Or [[UK/Minister/Defence Procurement]] to [[Le Cercle]]. Looking over the examples should help us choose a suitable name. | would be nearer the mark. This then raises the question of how to record the disproportionate number(4?) of [[Rhodes Scholars]] in the group. I don't see any properties designed for this, or which could be easily stretched to include it. So a new [[property]] would seem to be justified. Suggestions on what to name it are welcome, as are instances where it could be applied. For example [[COVID-19/Perpetrators]] has this relationship to the [[WEF/YGL]], [[WEF/GLT]] and the [[Bilderberg]]. Or [[UK/Minister/Defence Procurement]] to [[Le Cercle]]. Looking over the examples should help us choose a suitable name. | ||
-- [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 03:14, 17 July 2023 (UTC) | -- [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 03:14, 17 July 2023 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | :A property named with the broader name "relevance" might be appropriate. | ||
+ | |relevance= | ||
+ | "Interests", while not strictly accurate, is a wonderfully quick way to make one article visible in another article, where otherwise the connection would be practically invisible, except in "What links here". | ||
+ | [[User:Terje|Terje]] ([[User talk:Terje|talk]]) 05:36, 17 July 2023 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::It is good that you made the connection, and stretching the uses of the terms as needed can be good practice, as can adding a new one when needed. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::The term "relevance" seems to me too general to be of help. I resisted the temptation to define another property and instead used [[property:founders]]. On closer inspection, I see that the group has 14 Bilderbergers but only 4 Rhodes scholars, so I'm crediting the former with its foundation. -- [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 01:26, 18 July 2023 (UTC) | ||
+ | -- [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 14:00, 17 July 2023 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 01:26, 18 July 2023
SMW use
I note that this page has the property:
|interests=Rhodes Scholarship
This is would suggest that the group, as a whole, is interested in the Rhodes Scholarship, which is not accurate; something such as
|interests=COVID-19/Vaccine/Mandation
would be nearer the mark. This then raises the question of how to record the disproportionate number(4?) of Rhodes Scholars in the group. I don't see any properties designed for this, or which could be easily stretched to include it. So a new property would seem to be justified. Suggestions on what to name it are welcome, as are instances where it could be applied. For example COVID-19/Perpetrators has this relationship to the WEF/YGL, WEF/GLT and the Bilderberg. Or UK/Minister/Defence Procurement to Le Cercle. Looking over the examples should help us choose a suitable name. -- Robin (talk) 03:14, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- A property named with the broader name "relevance" might be appropriate.
|relevance=
"Interests", while not strictly accurate, is a wonderfully quick way to make one article visible in another article, where otherwise the connection would be practically invisible, except in "What links here". Terje (talk) 05:36, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- It is good that you made the connection, and stretching the uses of the terms as needed can be good practice, as can adding a new one when needed.
- The term "relevance" seems to me too general to be of help. I resisted the temptation to define another property and instead used property:founders. On closer inspection, I see that the group has 14 Bilderbergers but only 4 Rhodes scholars, so I'm crediting the former with its foundation. -- Robin (talk) 01:26, 18 July 2023 (UTC)