Difference between revisions of "9-11 Research"
(image fix) |
(unstub) |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Website | {{Website | ||
|URL=http://911research.wtc7.net | |URL=http://911research.wtc7.net | ||
| − | | | + | |logo=9-11 research.png |
| + | |titular_logo=1 | ||
| + | |start=2003 | ||
| + | |own_words=A research consortium consisting of just a few individuals volunteering their time and resources to the effort. | ||
| + | |founders=Jim Hoffman | ||
| + | |description=A solid and early 9-11 investigation site, not much updated of late, but still containing valuable material. | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | {{ | + | '''9-11 Research''' is a solid and early 9-11 investigation site. While not much updated of late, but still containing lots of valuable material. |
| + | |||
| + | ==Own words== | ||
| + | 9-11 Research critically examines the [[official narrative|official government explanation]] of the attack and concludes that many of its key assertions are impossible. We do not pretend to know exactly how the attack was carried out or exactly who the perpetrators are, but there are plausible scenarios of how the attack could have been executed by insiders. | ||
| + | |||
| + | If the attack was indeed a "[[black-op]]", then we can expect that the operatives will have hidden their identities behind layer upon layer of [[cover story]]. Only a genuine investigation with meaningful powers will be able to peel away the layers of deception to expose the true perpetrators. We hope to facilitate such an investigation by first exposing the falsity of the outermost cover story: the official myth of 9/11/01.<ref>https://911research.wtc7.net/about/index.html</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{SMWDocs}} | ||
| + | ==References== | ||
| + | {{reflist}} | ||
Latest revision as of 09:23, 28 March 2024
| A solid and early 9-11 investigation site, not much updated of late, but still containing valuable material. |
http://911research.wtc7.net 
Started: 2003
Founder: Jim Hoffman
In its own words:
"A research consortium consisting of just a few individuals volunteering their time and resources to the effort."
9-11 Research is a solid and early 9-11 investigation site. While not much updated of late, but still containing lots of valuable material.
Own words
9-11 Research critically examines the official government explanation of the attack and concludes that many of its key assertions are impossible. We do not pretend to know exactly how the attack was carried out or exactly who the perpetrators are, but there are plausible scenarios of how the attack could have been executed by insiders.
If the attack was indeed a "black-op", then we can expect that the operatives will have hidden their identities behind layer upon layer of cover story. Only a genuine investigation with meaningful powers will be able to peel away the layers of deception to expose the true perpetrators. We hope to facilitate such an investigation by first exposing the falsity of the outermost cover story: the official myth of 9/11/01.[1]
Documents sourced from 9-11 Research
| Title | Type | Subject(s) | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document:Domestic Covert Ops for Socialists and Progressives | open letter | 9-11 | 13 March 2010 | Michael B. Green | |
| Document:FBI Anthrax Frame-up | article | 2001 Anthrax attacks Battelle | 19 August 2008 | Michael B. Green | |
| Document:Ford-Zelikow email | 9-11/Commission | 7 March 2003 | Trowbridge Ford | ||
| Document:How They Get Away With It | essay | 9-11/Commission Lee H. Hamilton Norman Mineta | 28 June 2006 | Michael B. Green | The mechanics of a cover-up |
