Difference between revisions of "Talk:2014 Ukraine coup/Anti-Terrorist-Operation"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
↑ The less the site name is used, the better, in case it one day gets ported elsewhere
(Quote marks) |
(Occam's Razor) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Quote marks== | ==Quote marks== | ||
| − | Hi Robin, does the quote mark rule also apply to the COVID-19 plastic terms such as | + | Hi [[user:Robin]], does the quote mark rule also apply to the COVID-19 plastic terms such as "Safe and Effective" and the <s>https://wikispooks.com/wiki/COVID-19/Media_Manipulation</s>[[Media Manipulation]]<ref>The less the site name is used, the better, in case it one day gets ported elsewhere</ref> examples. I remember making the point of no quotes only to reach no consensuses at that point. --[[User:Jun|Jun]] ([[User talk:Jun|talk]]) 15:06, 27 May 2022 (UTC) |
| + | |||
| + | :The quote mark rule was originally thought up to work with {{t|{{!}}<nowiki>so_called=1</nowiki>}}, not for actual quotes. We could make a {{t|{{!}}<nowiki>speech=1</nowiki>}} option to differentiate actual quotes, which would score for semantic accuracy. However, I'm inclined to follow [[Occam's Razor]] in order to manage SMW complexity, which I interpret as "never make more params than you ''need''". Using {{t|{{!}}<nowiki>so_called=1</nowiki>}} for those pages and stripping the quotes is the low effort option, which follows existing policy. Does it have any unwanted side effects? -- [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 19:02, 27 May 2022 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 19:03, 27 May 2022
Quote marks
Hi user:Robin, does the quote mark rule also apply to the COVID-19 plastic terms such as "Safe and Effective" and the https://wikispooks.com/wiki/COVID-19/Media_ManipulationMedia Manipulation[1] examples. I remember making the point of no quotes only to reach no consensuses at that point. --Jun (talk) 15:06, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
- The quote mark rule was originally thought up to work with |so_called=1, not for actual quotes. We could make a |speech=1 option to differentiate actual quotes, which would score for semantic accuracy. However, I'm inclined to follow Occam's Razor in order to manage SMW complexity, which I interpret as "never make more params than you need". Using |so_called=1 for those pages and stripping the quotes is the low effort option, which follows existing policy. Does it have any unwanted side effects? -- Robin (talk) 19:02, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
