Difference between revisions of "Jolyon Maugham"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This page imported content from Wikipedia on 29 November 2018.
Wikipedia is not affiliated with Wikispooks. Original page source here
m (reference tidy) |
(quote in description) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|image_caption='''Legal Challenge to Brexit'''<ref>''[[Document:Legal Challenge To Brexit]]''</ref> | |image_caption='''Legal Challenge to Brexit'''<ref>''[[Document:Legal Challenge To Brexit]]''</ref> | ||
|constitutes=barrister | |constitutes=barrister | ||
| − | |description=British barrister | + | |description=British barrister and NGO-activist. "[[George Soros]] has become one of the great bulwarks against [[fascism]]. He hasn't given [my NGO] any money. But I aspire to it acquiring sufficient influence that he does." |
|wikipedia= | |wikipedia= | ||
|twitter=https://twitter.com/JolyonMaugham | |twitter=https://twitter.com/JolyonMaugham | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|birth_name=Jolyon Toby Dennis Maugham | |birth_name=Jolyon Toby Dennis Maugham | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | '''Jolyon Maugham QC''' | + | '''Jolyon Maugham QC''' is a British barrister, as of 2023 practising in tax law at [[Deveraux Chambers]]<ref>https://doi.org/10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.U283232</ref>. He is the founder and director of the ''[[Good Law Project]]'', through which he has played a key role in bringing to court a number of legal challenges to the [[Brexit]] process.<ref>https://goodlawproject.org/about/</ref> |
Maugham's cases include defending the rights of British expats in Europe,<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/jan/17/britons-dutch-court-eu-rights-cannot-be-removed |</ref><ref>https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/mar/01/eu-citizenship-brexit-ecj-netherlands </ref> a case to clarify whether the Brexit process can be reversed by Parliament,<ref>https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-article50/court-rules-in-favour-of-case-on-britains-ability-to-reverse-brexit-idUSKBN1GW195 </ref> and a legal challenge to referendum spending by ''Vote Leave''.<ref>https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-03-23/anti-brexit-group-wins-challenge-against-vote-leave-spending-jf3zzsjz </ref><ref>https://www.ft.com/content/8f63a486-4233-11e8-803a-295c97e6fd0b </ref> | Maugham's cases include defending the rights of British expats in Europe,<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/jan/17/britons-dutch-court-eu-rights-cannot-be-removed |</ref><ref>https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/mar/01/eu-citizenship-brexit-ecj-netherlands </ref> a case to clarify whether the Brexit process can be reversed by Parliament,<ref>https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-article50/court-rules-in-favour-of-case-on-britains-ability-to-reverse-brexit-idUSKBN1GW195 </ref> and a legal challenge to referendum spending by ''Vote Leave''.<ref>https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-03-23/anti-brexit-group-wins-challenge-against-vote-leave-spending-jf3zzsjz </ref><ref>https://www.ft.com/content/8f63a486-4233-11e8-803a-295c97e6fd0b </ref> | ||
Jolyon Maugham has written extensively on [[Brexit]] and legal issues for many publications including ''[[The Daily Telegraph]]'',<ref>https://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/2016/11/19/how-nicola-sturgeon-could-shake-up-cosy-consensus-and-use-articl</ref> ''[[The Guardian]]''<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/profile/jolyon-maugham </ref> and the ''[[New Statesman]]''.<ref>https://www.newstatesman.com/writers/320811</ref> | Jolyon Maugham has written extensively on [[Brexit]] and legal issues for many publications including ''[[The Daily Telegraph]]'',<ref>https://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/2016/11/19/how-nicola-sturgeon-could-shake-up-cosy-consensus-and-use-articl</ref> ''[[The Guardian]]''<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/profile/jolyon-maugham </ref> and the ''[[New Statesman]]''.<ref>https://www.newstatesman.com/writers/320811</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{SMWQ | ||
| + | |source_name=Twitter | ||
| + | |source_URL=https://twitter.com/JolyonMaugham/status/961511319789858816 | ||
| + | |authors=Jolyon Maugham | ||
| + | |date=8 February 2018 | ||
| + | |subjects=George Soros, fascism, Good Law Project,Open Society Foundations,Good Law Project,NGO | ||
| + | |text=[[George Soros]] has become one of the great bulwarks against [[fascism]]. He hasn't given @GoodLawProject any money. But I aspire to it acquiring sufficient influence that he does. | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | |||
{{SMWDocs}} | {{SMWDocs}} | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Latest revision as of 07:21, 24 May 2023
 Jolyon Maugham QC    (barrister) | |
|---|---|
 Legal Challenge to Brexit[1] | |
| Born | Jolyon Toby Dennis Maugham 1 July 1971 |
British barrister and NGO-activist. "George Soros has become one of the great bulwarks against fascism. He hasn't given [my NGO] any money. But I aspire to it acquiring sufficient influence that he does." | |
Jolyon Maugham QC is a British barrister, as of 2023 practising in tax law at Deveraux Chambers[2]. He is the founder and director of the Good Law Project, through which he has played a key role in bringing to court a number of legal challenges to the Brexit process.[3]
Maugham's cases include defending the rights of British expats in Europe,[4][5] a case to clarify whether the Brexit process can be reversed by Parliament,[6] and a legal challenge to referendum spending by Vote Leave.[7][8]
Jolyon Maugham has written extensively on Brexit and legal issues for many publications including The Daily Telegraph,[9] The Guardian[10] and the New Statesman.[11]
“George Soros has become one of the great bulwarks against fascism. He hasn't given @GoodLawProject any money. But I aspire to it acquiring sufficient influence that he does.”
Jolyon Maugham (8 February 2018) [12]
Related Document
| Title | Type | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document:ECJ Advocate General says UK can revoke Article 50 unilaterally | Article | 4 December 2018 | Tony Connelly | Article 50 allows the "unilateral revocation of the notification of the intention to withdraw from the EU, until such time as the Withdrawal Agreement is formally concluded" |
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.
References
- ↑ Document:Legal Challenge To Brexit
- ↑ https://doi.org/10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.U283232
- ↑ https://goodlawproject.org/about/
- ↑ https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/jan/17/britons-dutch-court-eu-rights-cannot-be-removed |
- ↑ https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/mar/01/eu-citizenship-brexit-ecj-netherlands
- ↑ https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-article50/court-rules-in-favour-of-case-on-britains-ability-to-reverse-brexit-idUSKBN1GW195
- ↑ https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-03-23/anti-brexit-group-wins-challenge-against-vote-leave-spending-jf3zzsjz
- ↑ https://www.ft.com/content/8f63a486-4233-11e8-803a-295c97e6fd0b
- ↑ https://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/2016/11/19/how-nicola-sturgeon-could-shake-up-cosy-consensus-and-use-articl
- ↑ https://www.theguardian.com/profile/jolyon-maugham
- ↑ https://www.newstatesman.com/writers/320811
- ↑ https://twitter.com/JolyonMaugham/status/961511319789858816 Twitter
This page imported content from Wikipedia on 29 November 2018.Wikipedia is not affiliated with Wikispooks. Original page source here
