Difference between revisions of "Hit piece"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Text replacement - "==Examples==" to "== Selected Examples ==") |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{concept | {{concept | ||
| − | |wikipedia= | + | |wikipedia=https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/hit_piece#:~:text=hit%20piece%20(plural%20hit%20pieces,that%20appears%20objective%20and%20truthful. |
| − | |constitutes=propaganda | + | |constitutes=propaganda, statecraft |
|image=hit piece.png | |image=hit piece.png | ||
| − | |description=something | + | |description=something published with the intent to sway public opinion by presenting false information in a way that appears objective and honest. |
}} | }} | ||
A '''hit piece''' is a publication, whether factual or otherwise, designed to create a negative impression in the mind of the audience. | A '''hit piece''' is a publication, whether factual or otherwise, designed to create a negative impression in the mind of the audience. | ||
| − | ==Examples== | + | == Selected Examples == |
The [[BBC]]'s ''[[Conspiracy Road Trip]]'' about [[9-11]] was termed a "well-crafted hit piece" by one of its participants.<ref>http://911truthnews.com/911-conspiracy-roadtrip-a-participants-perspective/</ref> | The [[BBC]]'s ''[[Conspiracy Road Trip]]'' about [[9-11]] was termed a "well-crafted hit piece" by one of its participants.<ref>http://911truthnews.com/911-conspiracy-roadtrip-a-participants-perspective/</ref> | ||
{{SMWDocs}} | {{SMWDocs}} | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 14:15, 3 May 2022
 Hit piece  (propaganda, statecraft)   | |
|---|---|
 | |
| something published with the intent to sway public opinion by presenting false information in a way that appears objective and honest. |
A hit piece is a publication, whether factual or otherwise, designed to create a negative impression in the mind of the audience.
Selected Examples
The BBC's Conspiracy Road Trip about 9-11 was termed a "well-crafted hit piece" by one of its participants.[1]
Examples
| Page name | Description |
|---|---|
| Conspiracy Files | A series of programmes, each of which focuses on a particular "Conspiracy theories". |
| Document:Julian Assange is a suspected Russian intelligence asset | "If Assange was interested in avoiding extradition to the US, he'd have gone to Sweden to answer the charges that were unlikely to see a conviction, and where he had far less chance of being extradited. But if he really WERE a Russian intelligence asset... well, then it all makes sense." - except that what it really makes is nonsense. |
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.
