Difference between revisions of "Document:US Openly Approves Hong Kong Chaos it Created"
m (add link) |
m (add link) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
*[http://landdestroyer.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/hong-kongs-occupy-central-is-us-backed.html Hong Kong's "Occupy Central" is US-backed Sedition] - LDS 1 October 2014 | *[http://landdestroyer.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/hong-kongs-occupy-central-is-us-backed.html Hong Kong's "Occupy Central" is US-backed Sedition] - LDS 1 October 2014 | ||
*[http://www.globalresearch.ca/occupy-central-hong-kongs-fight-against-neoliberalism/5405426 Occupy Central: Hong Kong’s Fight against Neoliberalism] - Global Research 1 October 2014 | *[http://www.globalresearch.ca/occupy-central-hong-kongs-fight-against-neoliberalism/5405426 Occupy Central: Hong Kong’s Fight against Neoliberalism] - Global Research 1 October 2014 | ||
+ | *[http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-10-01/us-secretly-egging-hong-kong-protesters Is the U.S. Secretly Egging On Hong Kong Protesters?] - Zero Hedge 1 October 2014 | ||
}} | }} | ||
===Introduction=== | ===Introduction=== |
Revision as of 10:52, 1 October 2014
There is more to the September 2014 demonstrations in Hong Kong than western media reports of "popular protests for democracy". |
![Disclaimer (#3)](/w/images/thumb/6/69/I.png/25px-I.png)
![Document.png](/w/images/thumb/5/5e/Document.png/26px-Document.png)
Subjects: Globalisation, Hong Kong
Source: Land Destroyer Report (Link)
Image Right: White House Press Secretary and Spokesman on Thailand, Josh Earnest.
Author's Note
The US now openly supports chaos on the streets of Hong Kong, this after condemning "occupy" protests in Bangkok earlier this year. [1] The difference being in Thailand, protests sought to oust a US proxy, Hong Kong protests seek to put one into power.
See Also
External Links
- Hong Kong's "Occupy Central" is US-backed Sedition - LDS 1 October 2014
- Occupy Central: Hong Kong’s Fight against Neoliberalism - Global Research 1 October 2014
- Is the U.S. Secretly Egging On Hong Kong Protesters? - Zero Hedge 1 October 2014
★ Start a Discussion about this document
Contents
Introduction
The "Occupy Central" protests in Hong Kong continue on - destabilizing the small southern Chinese island famous as an international hub for corporate-financier interests, and before that, the colonial ambitions of the British Empire. Those interests have been conspiring for years to peel the island away from Beijing after it was begrudgingly returned to China in the late 1990's, and use it as a springboard to further destabilize mainland China. [2]
Behind the so-called "Occupy Central" protests, which masquerade as a "pro-democracy" movement seeking "universal suffrage" and "full democracy," is a deep and insidious network of foreign financial, political, and media support. Prominent among them is the US State Department and its National Endowment for Democracy (NED) as well as NED's subsidiary, the National Democratic Institute (NDI).
Now, the US has taken a much more overt stance in supporting the chaos their own manipulative networks have prepared and are now orchestrating. The White House has now officially backed "Occupy Central." Reuters in its article, "White House Shows Support For Aspirations Of Hong Kong People," would claim:
The White House is watching democracy protests in Hong Kong closely and supports the "aspirations of the Hong Kong people, "White House spokesman Josh Earnest said on Monday."
The United States supports universal suffrage in Hong Kong in accordance with the Basic Law and we support the aspirations of the Hong Kong people," said Earnest, who also urged restraint on both sides. [3]
US State Department Has Built Up and Directs "Occupy Central"
Earnest's comments are verbatim the demands of "Occupy Central" protest leaders, but more importantly, verbatim the long-laid designs the US State Department's NDI articulates on its own webpage dedicated to its ongoing meddling in Hong Kong. The term "universal suffrage"and reference to "Basic Law" and its "interpretation" to mean "genuine democracy" is stated clearly on NDI's website which claims:
The Basic Law put in place a framework of governance, whereby special interest groups, or “functional constituencies,” maintain half of the seats in the Legislative Council (LegCo). At present, Hong Kong’s chief executive is also chosen by an undemocratically selected committee. According to the language of the Basic Law, however, “universal suffrage” is the “ultimate aim.” While “universal suffrage” remains undefined in the law, Hong Kong citizens have interpreted it to mean genuine democracy. [4]
To push this agenda - which essentially is to prevent Beijing from vetting candidates running for office in Hong Kong, thus opening the door to politicians openly backed, funded, and directed by the US State Department - NDI lists an array of ongoing meddling it is carrying out on the island. It states:
Since 1997, NDI has conducted a series of missions to Hong Kong to consider the development of Hong Kong’s “post-reversion” election framework, the status of autonomy, rule of law and civil liberties under Chinese sovereignty, and the prospects for, and challenges to democratization.
It also claims:
In 2005, NDI initiated a six-month young political leaders program focused on training a group of rising party and political group members in political communications skills.
And:
NDI has also worked to bring political parties, government leaders and civil society actors together in public forums to discuss political party development, the role of parties in Hong Kong and political reform. In 2012, for example, a conference by Hong Kong think tank SynergyNet supported by NDI featured panelists from parties across the ideological spectrum and explored how adopting a system of coalition government might lead to a more responsive legislative process.
NDI also admits it has created, funded, and backed other organizations operating in Hong Kong toward achieving the US State Department's goals of subverting Beijing's control over the island:
In 2007, the Institute launched a women’s political participation program that worked with the Women’s Political Participation Network (WPPN) and the Hong Kong Federation of Women’s Centres (HKFWC) to enhance women’s participation in policy-making, encourage increased participation in politics and ensure that women’s issues are taken into account in the policy-making process.
And on a separate page, NDI describes programs it is conducting with the University of Hong Kong to achieve its agenda:
The Centre for Comparative and Public Law (CCPL) at the University of Hong Kong, with support from NDI, is working to amplify citizens’ voices in that consultation process by creating Design Democracy Hong Kong (www.designdemocracy.hk), a unique and neutral website that gives citizens a place to discuss the future of Hong Kong’s electoral system. [5]
It should be no surprise to readers then, to find out each and every "Occupy Central" leader is either directly linked to the US State Department, NED, and NDI, or involved in one of NDI's many schemes.
"Occupy Central's" self-proclaimed leader, Benny Tai, is a law professor at the aforementioned University of Hong Kong and a regular collaborator with the NDI-funded CCPL. In 2006-2007 [6] he was named as a board member - a position he has held until at least as recently as last year. In CCPL's 2011-2013 annual report [7], NDI is listed as having provided funding to the organization to:
"design and implement an online Models of Universal Suffrage portal where the general public can discuss and provide feedback and ideas on which method of universal suffrage is most suitable for Hong Kong."
Curiously, in CCPL's most recent annual report for 2013-2014 [8], Tai is not listed as a board member. However, he is listed as participating in at least 3 conferences organized by CCPL, and as heading at least one of CCPL's projects. At least one conference has him speaking side-by-side another prominent "Occupy Central" figure, Audrey Eu. The 2013-2014 annual report also lists NDI as funding CCPL's "Design Democracy Hong Kong" website.
Civic Party chairwoman Audrey Eu Yuet-mee, in addition to speaking at CCPL-NDI functions side-by-side with Benny Tai, is entwined with the US State Department and its NDI elsewhere. She regularly attends forums sponsored by NED and its subsidiary NDI. In 2009 she was a featured speaker at an NDI sponsored public policy forum hosted by "SynergyNet," also funded by NDI. [9] In 2012 she was a guest speaker at the NDI-funded Women's Centre "International Women's Day" event, [10] hosted by the Hong Kong Council of Women (HKCW) which is also annually funded by the NDI.
![](/w/images/thumb/d/d7/Biden-Lee.jpg/350px-Biden-Lee.jpg)
There is also Martin Lee, founding chairman of Hong Kong's Democrat Party and another prominent figure who has come out in support of "Occupy Central." Just this year, Lee was in Washington [11] meeting directly with US Vice President Joseph Biden, US Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi, and even took part in an NED talk hosted specifically for him and his agenda of "democracy" in Hong Kong. Lee even has a NED page dedicated to him [12] after he was awarded in 1997 NED's "Democracy Award." [13] With him in Washington was Anson Chan, another prominent figure currently supporting the ongoing unrest in Hong Kong's streets.
"Occupy Central's" Very Unpopular Agenda
If democracy is characterized by self-rule, than an "Occupy Central" movement in which every prominent figure is the benefactor of and beholden to foreign cash, support, and a foreign-driven agenda, has nothing at all to do with democracy. It does have, however, everything to do with abusing democracy to undermine Beijing's control over Hong Kong, and open the door to candidates that clearly serve foreign interests, not those of China, or even the people of Hong Kong.
![](/w/images/thumb/e/ee/NEDcorporateInterests.jpg/350px-NEDcorporateInterests.jpg)
What is more telling is the illegal referendum "Occupy Central" conducted earlier this year in an attempt to justify impending, planned chaos in Hong Kong's streets. The referendum focused on the US State Department's goal of implementing "universal suffrage" - however, only a fifth of Hong Kong's electorate participated in the referendum, and of those that did participate, no alternative was given beyond US-backed organizations and their respective proposals to undermine Beijing.
The BBC would report in its article, "Hong Kong democracy 'referendum' draws nearly 800,000," that:
A total of 792,808 voters took part in an unofficial referendum on universal suffrage in Hong Kong, organisers said.
The 10-day poll was held by protest group Occupy Central.
Campaigners want the public to be able to elect Hong Kong's leader, the chief executive. The Hong Kong government says the vote has no legal standing.
About 42% of voters backed a proposal allowing the public, a nominating committee, and political parties to name candidates for the top job. [14]
For a protest movement that claims it stands for "democracy," implied to mean the will of the people, it has an unpopular agenda clearly rejected by the vast majority of Hong Kong's population - and is now disrupting vital parts of the island, holding the population and stability hostage to push its agenda. All of this is being orchestrated and supported by the United States, its State Department, and its network of global sedition operating under NED and its subsidiary NDI.
While the Western media shows mobs of "thousands" implying that "the people" support ongoing chaos in Hong Kong's streets, "Occupy Central's" own staged, illegal referendum proves it does not have the backing of the people and that its agenda is rejected both by mainland China and the people of Hong Kong.
Exposing the insidious, disingenuous, foreign-driven nature of "Occupy Central" is important. It is also important to objectively examine each and every protest that springs up around the world. Superficiality cannot "link" one movement to another, one group to hidden special interests. Rather, one must adhere to due diligence in identifying and profiling the leaders, following the money, identifying their true motivations, and documenting their links to special interests within or beyond the borders of the nation the protests are taking place in.
By doing this, movements like "Occupy Central" can be exposed, blunted, and rolled over before the destruction and chaos other US-backed destabilization efforts have exacted elsewhere - namely the Middle East and Ukraine - can unfold in Hong Kong.
References
- ↑ US' Creeping Front Against Thailand - LDR 18 January 2014
- ↑ On Cue - China Terror Attack Mars Historic Gas Deal - LDR 27 May 2014
- ↑ White House Shows Support For Aspirations Of Hong Kong People - Huffington Post 29 September 2014
- ↑ The Promise of Democratization in Hong Kong' Report Series - NDI web site
- ↑ Designing Democracy in Hong Kong - NDI web site
- ↑ CCPL Annual Report 2006-7 - pdf
- ↑ CCPL Annual Report 2012-13 - pdf
- ↑ CCPL Annual Report 2013-14 - pdf
- ↑ Refining the Principal Officials Accountability System - Synergy.net 14 November 2009
- ↑ FWC event brochure - pdf
- ↑ Beijing upset after Martin Lee and Anson Chan meet Joe Biden at the White House - South China Morning Post 7 April 2014
- ↑ Martin C M Lee - NED Website page
- ↑ 1997 NED Democracy Award honors Heroes of Human Rights and Democracy in Hong Kong - NED 9 April 1997
- ↑ Hong Kong democracy 'referendum' draws nearly 800,000 - BBC News China 30 June 2014