Difference between revisions of "Biodefense"
(stub) |
(Problems with official narrativ) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{concept | {{concept | ||
| − | | | + | |wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biodefense |
| + | |image=diodefense.jpg | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | "From 2001 to 2009, as the U.S. government increased its annual expenditures on biodefense efforts from about $50 million to some $8 billion, [[[Carol R. Kuntz]]] played a leading role in shaping many of the new initiatives."<ref>http://speakerpedia.com/speakers/carol-r-kuntz</ref> | + | "From 2001 to 2009, as the U.S. government increased its annual expenditures on biodefense efforts from about $50 million to some $8 billion, [<nowiki/>[[Carol R. Kuntz]]] played a leading role in shaping many of the new initiatives."<ref>http://speakerpedia.com/speakers/carol-r-kuntz</ref> |
| + | |||
| + | ==Problems with official narrative== | ||
| + | Making and spreading [[biological weapons]] is fraught with difficulty - getting them into people often fails, and a limited number of people will get sick from direct exposure. Making biological weapons spread between people is equally difficult to achieve. | ||
| + | |||
| + | However, the drugs presented as '''countermeasures''' can be injected into billions of arms as protective "vaccines", as happened with the [[Covid jabs]]. These are the real biological weapons threat. | ||
==Researchers== | ==Researchers== | ||
| − | [[Bruce Ivins]], a microbiologist, vaccinologist and biodefense researcher at [[Fort Detrick]], was blamed by the [[FBI]] for the [[2001 anthrax attacks]]. | + | [[Bruce Ivins]], a microbiologist, vaccinologist and biodefense researcher at [[Fort Detrick]], was blamed by the [[FBI]] for the [[2001 anthrax attacks]].<ref>http://www.unwelcomeguests.net/561</ref> |
{{SMWDocs}} | {{SMWDocs}} | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{Reflist}} | {{Reflist}} | ||
{{Stub}} | {{Stub}} | ||
Latest revision as of 06:55, 25 November 2024
 Biodefense    | |
|---|---|
 | |
"From 2001 to 2009, as the U.S. government increased its annual expenditures on biodefense efforts from about $50 million to some $8 billion, [Carol R. Kuntz] played a leading role in shaping many of the new initiatives."[1]
Problems with official narrative
Making and spreading biological weapons is fraught with difficulty - getting them into people often fails, and a limited number of people will get sick from direct exposure. Making biological weapons spread between people is equally difficult to achieve.
However, the drugs presented as countermeasures can be injected into billions of arms as protective "vaccines", as happened with the Covid jabs. These are the real biological weapons threat.
Researchers
Bruce Ivins, a microbiologist, vaccinologist and biodefense researcher at Fort Detrick, was blamed by the FBI for the 2001 anthrax attacks.[2]
Related Quotation
| Page | Quote | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Biological weapon | “Fabricating scary narratives about superbugs is much easier than delivering on promises of making those bugs in labs. This is also a very productive avenue as people are woefully gullible and thus can be controlled by narratives just as effectively as by an actual scary-scary bioengineered virus. Biodefense is a huge grift on both sides. 'Their' side appropriates money and power, and new billion dollar agencies for 'Pandemic Preparedness'. 'Our' side gets millions of followers talking about them evil guys, or spinning stories about biolabs in Wuhan, Ukraine and lately California. They leak' from labs almost every week, and using CRISPER gene drive narrative logic, all mice in the world should look like Ralph Baric by now.” | Sasha Latypova | November 2023 |
