Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ford Foundation"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (t) |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:The [[Le Cercle]] page cites ''[[Rogue Agents]]'', which cites "(130) ''[[State Research]]'' no. 1; Ramsay and Dorril, pg 38." - which would likely be an interesting read, if only we can find it. -- [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 18:44, 3 November 2023 (UTC) | :The [[Le Cercle]] page cites ''[[Rogue Agents]]'', which cites "(130) ''[[State Research]]'' no. 1; Ramsay and Dorril, pg 38." - which would likely be an interesting read, if only we can find it. -- [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 18:44, 3 November 2023 (UTC) | ||
− | IMO this specific sentence should be put back in place. The references are good enough. Also, it is not particularly libelous. | + | ::IMO this specific sentence should be put back in place. The references are good enough Ramsay&Dorrill being [[Lobster]] magazine. Also, it is not particularly libelous. |
[[User:Terje|Terje]] ([[User talk:Terje|talk]]) 23:28, 3 November 2023 (UTC) | [[User:Terje|Terje]] ([[User talk:Terje|talk]]) 23:28, 3 November 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:30, 4 November 2023
I can't find the Le Cercle Ford connection. At a certain point we really need to just add the link where these things are claimed. Litigation is just one step away. Jun (talk) 17:17, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
- The Le Cercle page cites Rogue Agents, which cites "(130) State Research no. 1; Ramsay and Dorril, pg 38." - which would likely be an interesting read, if only we can find it. -- Robin (talk) 18:44, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
- IMO this specific sentence should be put back in place. The references are good enough Ramsay&Dorrill being Lobster magazine. Also, it is not particularly libelous.