Difference between revisions of "User talk:Polaris97"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Follow-up on the recent edit, and response to Robin)
m (Text replacement - "WikiSpooks" to "Wikispooks")
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Welcome to Wikispooks! ==
 
== Welcome to Wikispooks! ==
  
<big>We're glad you came. There's [[WikiSpooks:To_Do|lots to do]].</big><br/>
+
<big>We're glad you came. There's [[Wikispooks:To_Do|lots to do]].</big><br/>
The '''[[WikiSpooks:Community portal|Community portal]]''' is probably the best place to start for new users. To add a Wikispooks search facility to your browser, go [http://mycroftproject.com/search-engines.html?name=wikispooks here]. If you've got a topic you're itching to write about, just dive in. If you're not sure where to start, you can introduce yourself by editing either this page or your user page. [[User:Peter|Peter P]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 07:48, 21 May 2014 (IST)
+
The '''[[Wikispooks:Community portal|Community portal]]''' is probably the best place to start for new users. To add a Wikispooks search facility to your browser, go [http://mycroftproject.com/search-engines.html?name=wikispooks here]. If you've got a topic you're itching to write about, just dive in. If you're not sure where to start, you can introduce yourself by editing either this page or your user page. [[User:Peter|Peter P]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 07:48, 21 May 2014 (IST)
 +
 
 +
:Thank you, sir!  The opportunity to contribute is very much welcome--and I endeavor to offer helpful information whenever possible.
  
 
== Welcome, Listener :) ==
 
== Welcome, Listener :) ==
Line 10: Line 12:
 
== Congratulations on your first edit ==
 
== Congratulations on your first edit ==
  
Congratulations on starting off [[9-11/Pentagon]]. I've just expanded it a bit. I put your remarks in a Quotation Box, since otherwise people won't know who "I" refers to. I just ammended [[WikiSpooks:Style_Guide#Encyclopedic_Style]] to clarify that while "I" and "you" are good for talk pages (such as this one), they should be avoided in the main articles.
+
Congratulations on starting off [[9-11/Pentagon]]. I've just expanded it a bit. I put your remarks in a Quotation Box, since otherwise people won't know who "I" refers to. I just ammended [[Wikispooks:Style_Guide#Encyclopedic_Style]] to clarify that while "I" and "you" are good for talk pages (such as this one), they should be avoided in the main articles.
  
 
I'm afraid I can't help on the specific question you ask, but I do seem to recall (though I don't have a reference) that the same part of the pentagon which was hit was the part which had just been reinforced. [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 17:53, 23 May 2014 (IST)
 
I'm afraid I can't help on the specific question you ask, but I do seem to recall (though I don't have a reference) that the same part of the pentagon which was hit was the part which had just been reinforced. [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 17:53, 23 May 2014 (IST)
  
Thank you, sir!  The "I" and "you" wording was a concern of mine, and going forward such considerations will be taken into account.  I am in agreement and am also aware, as well: the portion of the building that was struck had been, already before the program aired, been reinforced for "bomb proofing" and subsequently put to a test, via whatever it was that actually made contact with the structure.  That "prooffing" was also an issue raised in the show, at the end during the credits.
+
:Thank you, sir!  The "I" and "you" wording was a concern of mine, and going forward such considerations will be taken into account.  I am in agreement and am also aware, as well: the portion of the building that was struck had been, already before the program aired, been reinforced for "bomb proofing" and subsequently put to a test, via whatever it was that actually made contact with the structure.  That "prooffing" was also an issue raised in the show, at the end during the credits.

Latest revision as of 17:09, 14 October 2018

Welcome to Wikispooks!

We're glad you came. There's lots to do.
The Community portal is probably the best place to start for new users. To add a Wikispooks search facility to your browser, go here. If you've got a topic you're itching to write about, just dive in. If you're not sure where to start, you can introduce yourself by editing either this page or your user page. Peter P (talk) 07:48, 21 May 2014 (IST)

Thank you, sir! The opportunity to contribute is very much welcome--and I endeavor to offer helpful information whenever possible.

Welcome, Listener :)

Welcome to Wikispooks! The 9/11 pages are pretty thin, so that could be one good place to start. If you've been listening to Mark Gorton's ideas on the deep state, that's another place - yesterday I created The Cabal. Don't hesitate to ask if you need technical help. Robin (talk) 15:37, 21 May 2014 (IST)

Congratulations on your first edit

Congratulations on starting off 9-11/Pentagon. I've just expanded it a bit. I put your remarks in a Quotation Box, since otherwise people won't know who "I" refers to. I just ammended Wikispooks:Style_Guide#Encyclopedic_Style to clarify that while "I" and "you" are good for talk pages (such as this one), they should be avoided in the main articles.

I'm afraid I can't help on the specific question you ask, but I do seem to recall (though I don't have a reference) that the same part of the pentagon which was hit was the part which had just been reinforced. Robin (talk) 17:53, 23 May 2014 (IST)

Thank you, sir! The "I" and "you" wording was a concern of mine, and going forward such considerations will be taken into account. I am in agreement and am also aware, as well: the portion of the building that was struck had been, already before the program aired, been reinforced for "bomb proofing" and subsequently put to a test, via whatever it was that actually made contact with the structure. That "prooffing" was also an issue raised in the show, at the end during the credits.