Difference between revisions of "Talk:Boston Marathon bombings"
(Created page with "== Smoke Machines == Weren't there Hollywood-type smoke machines there or can that be debunked? ~ ~~~~") |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{talk}} | ||
== Smoke Machines == | == Smoke Machines == | ||
Weren't there Hollywood-type smoke machines there or can that be debunked? ~ '''<font face="Arial">[[User:JasonCarswell|<font color="black">JasonCarswell</font>]] <small>[[User talk:JasonCarswell|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></font>''' 05:11, 19 August 2016 (IST) | Weren't there Hollywood-type smoke machines there or can that be debunked? ~ '''<font face="Arial">[[User:JasonCarswell|<font color="black">JasonCarswell</font>]] <small>[[User talk:JasonCarswell|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></font>''' 05:11, 19 August 2016 (IST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I know very little about this. I recommend searching and see what you can find. In a pinch, if I want to put information down quickly and can't find evidence for something I'm almost sure is true, then I just write it without a reference and then a little{{cn}} note to help people investigate this. Generally though, that is bad practice. For anything controversial, use references - as far as they're available. It's amazing what a determined search can turn up. Or ''not'' turn up! Yesterday I looked for a decent source for the [[Red House meeting]], but seems there is none. Accordingly, I turned up the scepticism a lot on that atricle. --[[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 11:29, 19 August 2016 (IST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Staged Event == | ||
| + | The other angle on this is, that these were all actors. If a real bomb had exploded, there would have been more people around the explosion spot with notable injuries, injuries that would have caused them pain, bleeding etc, behavior of some bystanders, damage to clothing and other things do not add up and the most 'famous' of the victims with his legs blown away would have most certainly died given time, treatment and transport to the tent that he received -> (1) | ||
| + | https://www.sott.net/image/s7/141276/full/leg1.jpg (2) https://www.sott.net/image/s7/141275/full/bauman.jpg -> this is pretty thorough: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zpir3GQDj8 [[User:Sunvalley|Sunvalley]] ([[User talk:Sunvalley|talk]]) 18:41, 14 October 2017 (IST) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:41, 14 October 2017
Smoke Machines
Weren't there Hollywood-type smoke machines there or can that be debunked? ~ JasonCarswell (talk) 05:11, 19 August 2016 (IST)
- I know very little about this. I recommend searching and see what you can find. In a pinch, if I want to put information down quickly and can't find evidence for something I'm almost sure is true, then I just write it without a reference and then a little[citation needed] note to help people investigate this. Generally though, that is bad practice. For anything controversial, use references - as far as they're available. It's amazing what a determined search can turn up. Or not turn up! Yesterday I looked for a decent source for the Red House meeting, but seems there is none. Accordingly, I turned up the scepticism a lot on that atricle. --Robin (talk) 11:29, 19 August 2016 (IST)
Staged Event
The other angle on this is, that these were all actors. If a real bomb had exploded, there would have been more people around the explosion spot with notable injuries, injuries that would have caused them pain, bleeding etc, behavior of some bystanders, damage to clothing and other things do not add up and the most 'famous' of the victims with his legs blown away would have most certainly died given time, treatment and transport to the tent that he received -> (1) https://www.sott.net/image/s7/141276/full/leg1.jpg (2) https://www.sott.net/image/s7/141275/full/bauman.jpg -> this is pretty thorough: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zpir3GQDj8 Sunvalley (talk) 18:41, 14 October 2017 (IST)
