Difference between revisions of "Talk:9-11/Israel did it"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(What to do with this article?)
(high traffic)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{HighTraffic}}
 
Lots of problems and issues with this article. It illustrates the difficulty of using an existing HTML (or other non-wiki) source  as the the copy/paste/edit basis for a wiki article, rather than simply authoring from scratch.
 
Lots of problems and issues with this article. It illustrates the difficulty of using an existing HTML (or other non-wiki) source  as the the copy/paste/edit basis for a wiki article, rather than simply authoring from scratch.
  

Revision as of 12:13, 2 June 2014

Searchtraffic.jpg
This is a high traffic page.

Lots of problems and issues with this article. It illustrates the difficulty of using an existing HTML (or other non-wiki) source as the the copy/paste/edit basis for a wiki article, rather than simply authoring from scratch.

The following need attention:

  • Friendly-fi the YouTube links with explanatory text (embedding not really an option because it would slow the page down and make the text too disjointed). - Done --Peter P 13:46, 23 September 2010 (IST)
  • Masses of references to insert - lots available from the original source.
  • Information about anomalous trading in AAL and UAL securities needed - records destroyed in WT7; links (if they exist) to Zionist individuals/organisations etc. To go in evidence of pre-knowledge.
  • Lots of grammatical inconsistencies.
  • Probably a few others.
--Peter P 11:49, 23 September 2010 (IST)

Legacy content

This is not really an encyclopaedia article - it was imported as a finished product, so it belongs in the Document: namespace really. I've put in a few links, as I would even if it were made into a document, but if we leave it here, it needs editing, since some parts of it are weak. The idea that 9/11 had to be either CIA or Mossad, for example, is too simplistic, and doesn't acknowledge that such operations are hardly likely to be on the official books. A Cabal based off the record type agreement involving people within a whole bunch of different organisations seems more likely to me (à la Mark Gorton). Robin (talk) 13:12, 2 June 2014 (IST)