Difference between revisions of "Shyam Sunder"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|WP=
 
|WP=
 
|image=Shyam Sunder.jpg
 
|image=Shyam Sunder.jpg
|constitutes=academic
+
|constitutes=academic, deep state functionary
 
|interests=Conspiracy Theorists, WTC7
 
|interests=Conspiracy Theorists, WTC7
 
|historycommons=http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=shyam_sunder
 
|historycommons=http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=shyam_sunder
|description=Lead 'investigator' into the collapse of WTC7.
+
|description="Lead investigator" into the [[destruction of WTC7]].
 
}}
 
}}
 +
'''Dr. S. Shyam Sunder''' was "lead investigator" of the NIST report into the [[destruction of the World Trade Center]].<ref>
 +
https://canada.constructconnect.com/dcn/news/government/2017/11/911-destruction-controlled-demolition-fact-fiction</ref>
 +
 
==Official narrative==
 
==Official narrative==
 
Dr Sunder reported that the investigation into WTC7 was moving as fast as possible, stating "It's a very complex problem. It requires a level of fidelity in the modelling and rigour in the analysis that has never been done before."<ref>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7485331.stm</ref>
 
Dr Sunder reported that the investigation into WTC7 was moving as fast as possible, stating "It's a very complex problem. It requires a level of fidelity in the modelling and rigour in the analysis that has never been done before."<ref>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7485331.stm</ref>

Latest revision as of 13:42, 31 March 2019

Person.png Shyam SunderRdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png
(academic, deep state functionary)
Shyam Sunder.jpg
Interests • Conspiracy Theorists
• WTC7
"Lead investigator" into the destruction of WTC7.

Dr. S. Shyam Sunder was "lead investigator" of the NIST report into the destruction of the World Trade Center.[1]

Official narrative

Dr Sunder reported that the investigation into WTC7 was moving as fast as possible, stating "It's a very complex problem. It requires a level of fidelity in the modelling and rigour in the analysis that has never been done before."[2]

 

Related Document

TitleTypePublication dateAuthor(s)Description
File:Letter to Shyam Sunder.pdfletter20 July 2009Architects & Engineers for 9/11 TruthA challenge to NIST on 16 specific points and on behalf of its 4,600 professional signatories, proposes a meeting to explore them. A proposal which will likely never be taken up.
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.


References