Difference between revisions of "File:BBC ECU Response about Dr Rola.pdf"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replacement - "|Declassified" to "|declassified")
m (Text replacement - "|Recipient" to "|recipients")
Line 13: Line 13:
 
|local_copy=BBC ECU Response about Dr Rola.pdf
 
|local_copy=BBC ECU Response about Dr Rola.pdf
 
|declassified=No
 
|declassified=No
|Recipient=Robert Stuart
+
|recipients=Robert Stuart
 
}}
 
}}
 
''The BBC complaints editor's response to Robert Stuart's complaints about [[Dr Rola]]:''
 
''The BBC complaints editor's response to Robert Stuart's complaints about [[Dr Rola]]:''
  
 
"Thank you for your letter... the material does not support your finding... I accept that you may have found this confusing... It appears that we will have to disagree... I do not believe it necessary to seek independent confirmation... I do not believ it was necessary to include the political views of [[Dr Rola|Dr Hallam]]'s father (whatever they may be) in the BBC coverage to achieve due accuracy or due impartiality...."
 
"Thank you for your letter... the material does not support your finding... I accept that you may have found this confusing... It appears that we will have to disagree... I do not believe it necessary to seek independent confirmation... I do not believ it was necessary to include the political views of [[Dr Rola|Dr Hallam]]'s father (whatever they may be) in the BBC coverage to achieve due accuracy or due impartiality...."

Revision as of 02:16, 30 July 2014

The reponse from the BBC to the complaints about the veracity of the Dr Rola footage by Robert Stuart.

Disclaimer (#3)Document.png letter  by Colin Tregear  to Robert Stuart
Subjects: Dr Rola, BBC
Source: Fabrication in BBC Panorama's 'Saving Syria’s Children'

★ Start a Discussion about this document



The BBC complaints editor's response to Robert Stuart's complaints about Dr Rola:

"Thank you for your letter... the material does not support your finding... I accept that you may have found this confusing... It appears that we will have to disagree... I do not believe it necessary to seek independent confirmation... I do not believ it was necessary to include the political views of Dr Hallam's father (whatever they may be) in the BBC coverage to achieve due accuracy or due impartiality...."

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeDimensionsUserComment
current10:39, 29 June 2014 (1,012 KB)Robin (talk | contribs)The BBC complaints editor's response to Robert Stuart's complaints about Dr Rola.
  • You cannot overwrite this file.

There are no pages that use this file.