New Age
 New Age  (Esoteric Religion?)   | |
|---|---|
| Interest of | Biblioteca Pleyades |
| esoteric justification of destructiveness and violence | |
Unlike the broad meaning of the term in popular culture, on WS the underlying glorification of destructiveness which seem to be a common denominator of many 'oldschool' esoteric movements, is explored as they surface in deep politics.
Glorification of destructiveness may be subtle, as in demanding everybody get "better", adhering to (unattainable) perfectionism, or more bold as suggesting to tear down everything to build up a new and better world. It might come as a wish for apocalypse, embedded in ancient myths of reincarnation, initiation rites or euthanasia.
Secrecy is maintained by threats, a "don't snitch" rule, not to tell about the violent and often deceptive means by which the 'golden age' must be brought about. Wikipedia defines it thus:
The term New Age, along with related terms like new era and new world, long predate the emergence of the New Age movement, and have widely been used to assert that a better way of life for humanity is dawning. It occurs commonly, for instance, in political contexts; the Great Seal of the United States, designed in 1782, proclaims a "new order of ages", while in the 1980s the Soviet General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev proclaimed that "all mankind is entering a new age". (WP)
Despite the sweet talk, however, at the core of the esoteric schools discussed below, there is a fundamental disidentification with humanity. Glorification, mystification and sexualization of death: in order for something new to be 'born', something old must 'die'. To prevent opposition of those deemed inferior (and doomed to go under), a system of absolute obedience to (often invisible) higher masters is commonly taught and instituted for members of such cults.
Contents
Conspiracy theory?
The nature of conspiracies implies that only hypotheses may be formulated, acknowledging that secrecy can in fact be maintained by plausible deniability and by rules such as a strict need to know basis. Secret services have institutionalized this principle by different levels of "security clearances" their agents may hold.
Adherence to "orders from above" is key as well as believe in a "higher cause" or a "big idea" (Bush jr.[citation needed]); it also relieves the agent from responsibility for his/her actions, which in turn fosters psychological projection (cultivation of enemy images). It follows that members at lower levels or without necessary clearances may live in a very different reality than those at the upper echelons of secrecy cults.
To put forward an hypotheses of ideological meaning of so called deep events (in the absence of provable facts), a correlation analysis of a course of events and the ideological as well as the psychological makeup of historical secret societies may be helpful, as presented in declassified writings of these clubs. This is beyond the scope of this document; only some ancient writings concerned with spiritual aspects of power and control are briefly summarized.
Victory and manic triumph
The worror-king Naram-Sin made himself a little god[1] wearing an animal mask in this document from 2254-2218 BC through manic victory over the conquered enemy, worshiped and looked upon by his disciples.
The triumph of victory is apparently not enough; the enemy is devalued, degraded, mocked and humiliated - depicted as weak and chaotic, impaled by spears, desperate, fleeing in panic. A woman is begging Naram-Sin for mercy who shows his contempt and sadism by trampling the enemy underfoot. His inscription says: "Naram-Sin the powerful [unreadable] Sidur and Sutuni, princes of the Lulubi, gathered together and they made war against me." Notable is Naram-Sin's grandiosity and the false claim that he was the victim of the aggression of the enemy who conspired against him while at the same time perceiving himself as almighty.
A clear hierarchy is depicted: the highest god is invisible (or damaged), below are two suns or stars. One aspect is visible in a beam of light which shines on the slave-like losers like a spotlight, mocking their weakness. The other aspect is invisible and shines on the victorious warrior-king and his ordered imperial forces keeping in rank while marching over the disordered defenders. Apparently the losers have no clue about the bigger picture and are aware only of what they see in the bright light. On the other hand Naram-Sin, as principal of the work, has awareness of both sides.
There is a dichotomy between dark and bright, the two forces are fighting each other and the dark side is winning. Knowledge of these two sides and the belief the they are irreconcilable (the exclusion of even the possibility of cooperation of opposite forces is the key difference to less aggressive philosophies) is depicted as sentimental, mystical, hidden wisdom.[2] Later schools lamented hat this (simplistic) "hidden truth" had been lost in history, had been suppressed, persecuted, cornered or threatened (victim mentality, messiah complex, paranoid orientation), with the imperative to restore its place - if necessary by deception, trickery, covert methods and force.
BTW, the tendency to make oneself into a god at lifetime through manic triumph runs in Naram's family: his grandfather had the same Permanent war/Mentality. A recent example of the idea to become god-like is transhumanism (through fusion with technology that helps overcoming human "limitations" including death).
Self-proclaimed prophecy
The process of enlightenment described in western alchemical texts (Hermes, Rosenkreutz[[cn}}) is similar to the inner alchemy of Chinese Daoism, but with a spin: In Daoist texts, returning a complex system to its original state of harmony is the goal and acceptance and recognition of reality.[citation needed]
In some Western texts a more forceful "make it happen on purpose", the creation of reality is emphasized, a way to the top of a hierarchy, power over live and death and (as side effect): the creation of money. There is the assumption that outer alchemy reflects back on inner alchemy and vice versa (Hermes[citation needed]; both use the metaphor of fusion of opposite poles in a process of "cooking", thereby creating "gold". Becoming rich and being enlightened seems (magically) related. (cit. CH[citation needed])
- Daoism states that the original state of affairs is basically in order and in harmony with nature.
- Indian philosophy states gods are using the earth as playground (A. Watts[citation needed]).
- Buddhism states we can not know, therefore seeking control for its own sake means clinging to something we do not own and may lead to trouble.
Some western alchemical authors in contrast believe that we are living in a state of chaos, decay and in an authoritarian interpretation of Eastern philosophy (including the Indian cast system) want to bring about a "better" world. They claim that a newborn infant ("man") starts from an inferior position[3] and has yet to climb the ladder to wisdom and perfection.
Assuming inferiority in others often implies assuming a position of superiority for oneself --- which leads to self-proclaimed leadership: western texts stem from self-proclaimed prophet who, sometimes very explicitly, claim they are chosen to complete the path to perfection first (the path they suggest in their own writings) and to "deliver an imperative message from higher-ups".
There is also a sense of urgency and hope that the perceived chaotic state of the world will end if only humanity would listen. But unfortunately humanity is too stupid and therefore heading for disaster. It follows for these grandiose leaders that humanity needs rescuing from its own stupidity and the way to bring this about is prophecised in alchemical texts, i.e. the Rosecrucian "Chymical Hochzeit" (alchemical wedding), i.e. a fusion of opposites which default in the process to be reborn again on a higher level.
Rebirth and asscention
In the Rosecrucian "Chymical Hochzeit" rebirth is not only described as a complex process, but
- it is a one-way street to the top of a pyramid where man becomes god or god-like (disidentification with humanity) and
- it is described in a rather cruel and bloodthirsty fashion in what fits the archetypical black mass, including beheading of those opposites which must die to make way for progress, drinking of blood and later depiction of the scene as dream, "play", almost funny, confusing the boundaries of fantasy and reality.
An example
| Page name | Description |
|---|---|
| Scientism/Invisible College | Most respected scientists with a secret mission to influence government and make "science" an autocratic ideology or "world religion" |
Related Quotation
| Page | Quote | Author |
|---|---|---|
| Money/Creation | “Generally speaking the zero sum game promotes conflict. Conflicting parties need money to stand competition (in the extreme case: fight a war) in order to maintain their positive balance position. The only regulatory principle to limit the promotion of violence in all shapes and colors is the monetary monopoly's need to manage risk. Fatally, the risk taken by banks is distorted by the doctrine that the monetary monopoly as a whole may not fail. This so called Moral Hazard caused by public bailouts encourages investments in exploitation and war. What really trickles down is violence, not wealth.” | 'Smithy' |
Related Document
| Title | Type | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document:The Occult Technology of Power | letter | June 1974 | Anonymous | A letter and lecture transcripts addressed to a mature son from his father. Their purpose is to prepare the son for his taking the reins of a financial business empire. |
References
- ↑ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victory_Stele_of_Naram-Sin
- ↑ What Paul Watzlawick called the "thoughts ailing sallowness", referring to the need for secrecy to avoid being laughed at; in: Vom Schlechten des Guten (Of Badness in Goodness"), dtv, 1997
- ↑ which is not fundamentally different from the concept of "original sin" in the judeo-christian tradition or the assumption of a "death drive" (a priori hostile aggression) in Freudian psychology.
