9-11/Flight 93
 | |
| Interest of | Jochen Scholz, Gerhard Wisnewski |
|---|---|
| Description | The official narrative, that the plan crashed into soft earth and buried itself, explaining the complete lack of luggage, plane or body parts, was questioned by reporters at the time, but that coverage seems not to have been repeated. |
Shanksville
The official narrative, that a plane effectively buried itself, is particularly implausible; the alternative theory that missile was fired at it would seem to explain how debris can be scattered over an area of miles and who no bodies, luggage and only minimal plane parts were visible at the 'crash site'. There remains the utter lack of human remains or plane parts. The coroner, Wallace Miller remarked of the supposed crash scene that "It was a really a very unusual site. You almost would’ve thought the passengers had been dropped off somewhere... Even by the standard model of an airplane crash, there was very little, even by those standards." (CNN, 3/11/2002)[1]
Wallace Miller: "‘The interesting thing about this particular case is that I haven’t, to this day, 11 months later, seen any single drop of blood. Not a drop. The only thing I can deduce is that the crash was over in half a second. There was a fireball 15-20 metres high, so all of that material just got vaporised.’” (“On Hallowed Ground,” The Age, 9/9/2002)"[1]
Related Document
| Title | Type | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document:Norad-911-Jochen Scholz | interview | 30 January 2011 | Jochen Scholz | Excerpted from a NuoViso interview with Lieutenant-Colonel Jochen Scholz of the German air force on 911 and the war on terror. |
{Stub}}
