Difference between revisions of "Talk:Boston Marathon bombings"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Added Talk template) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Smoke Machines == | == Smoke Machines == | ||
Weren't there Hollywood-type smoke machines there or can that be debunked? ~ '''<font face="Arial">[[User:JasonCarswell|<font color="black">JasonCarswell</font>]] <small>[[User talk:JasonCarswell|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></font>''' 05:11, 19 August 2016 (IST) | Weren't there Hollywood-type smoke machines there or can that be debunked? ~ '''<font face="Arial">[[User:JasonCarswell|<font color="black">JasonCarswell</font>]] <small>[[User talk:JasonCarswell|<font color="gray">(talk)</font>]]</small></font>''' 05:11, 19 August 2016 (IST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I know very little about this. I recommend searching and see what you can find. In a pinch, if I want to put information down quickly and can't find evidence for something I'm almost sure is true, then I just write it without a reference and then a little{{cn}} note to help people investigate this. Generally though, that is bad practice. For anything controversial, use references - as far as they're available. It's amazing what a determined search can turn up. Or ''not'' turn up! Yesterday I looked for a decent source for the [[Red House meeting]], but seems there is none. Accordingly, I turned up the scepticism a lot on that atricle. --[[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 11:29, 19 August 2016 (IST) | ||
Revision as of 10:29, 19 August 2016
Smoke Machines
Weren't there Hollywood-type smoke machines there or can that be debunked? ~ JasonCarswell (talk) 05:11, 19 August 2016 (IST)
- I know very little about this. I recommend searching and see what you can find. In a pinch, if I want to put information down quickly and can't find evidence for something I'm almost sure is true, then I just write it without a reference and then a little[citation needed] note to help people investigate this. Generally though, that is bad practice. For anything controversial, use references - as far as they're available. It's amazing what a determined search can turn up. Or not turn up! Yesterday I looked for a decent source for the Red House meeting, but seems there is none. Accordingly, I turned up the scepticism a lot on that atricle. --Robin (talk) 11:29, 19 August 2016 (IST)
