Difference between revisions of "Bruce Ivins"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(|victim_of=premature death) |
m (links) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Person | {{Person | ||
|name=Bruce Ivins | |name=Bruce Ivins | ||
| − | | | + | |ON_constitutes=Lone nut |
| − | | | + | |ON_killer=Bruce Ivins |
|killer=Unknown | |killer=Unknown | ||
|description=A biodefense researcher at Fort Detrick, Maryland who, the FBI concluded, sent anthrax letters with crude anti-Zionist messages to the US politicians who were holding up the rollback of civil liberties in the wake of 9/11. After an investigation costing around $100,000,000 Ivins was declared to be a lone nut responsible for the crime shortly after he was found dead. | |description=A biodefense researcher at Fort Detrick, Maryland who, the FBI concluded, sent anthrax letters with crude anti-Zionist messages to the US politicians who were holding up the rollback of civil liberties in the wake of 9/11. After an investigation costing around $100,000,000 Ivins was declared to be a lone nut responsible for the crime shortly after he was found dead. | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
==Official Narrative== | ==Official Narrative== | ||
| − | On August 6, 2008, federal prosecutors declared Ivins to be the ([[lone nut]]) culprit of the crime.<ref>[http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/08/06/anthrax.case/index.html?eref=rss_topstories U.S. officials declare researcher is anthrax killer] CNN 6 August 2008</ref> | + | On August 6, 2008, federal prosecutors declared Ivins to be the ([[lone nut]]) culprit of the crime.<ref>[http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/08/06/anthrax.case/index.html?eref=rss_topstories U.S. officials declare researcher is anthrax killer] CNN 6 August 2008</ref> Two days later, senators [[Charles Grassley]] and [[Rush Holt]] called for hearings into the [[DOJ]] and [[FBI]]'s handling of the investigation.<ref>[http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/middleeast/la-na-anthrax8-2008aug08,0,2258246.story Anthrax investigation should be investigated, congressmen say] Associated Press 8 August 2008</ref><ref>ISBN 978-1-60239-715-6 The Anthrax Letters: A Bioterrorism Expert Investigates the Attacks That Shocked America-Case Closed?</ref> On February 19, 2010, the FBI formally closed its investigation. <ref>[http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/20/us/20anthrax.html F.B.I., Laying Out Evidence, Closes Anthrax Letters Case] New York Times 19 February 2010</ref> |
Media reports focused on other possible suspects for years, but FBI files show that the investigation began to focus on Bruce Edwards Ivins as early as April 4, 2005, when Dr. Ivins told the FBI he would not talk any further without his lawyer present. On April 11, 2007, Dr. Ivins was put under periodic surveillance because "Bruce Edwards Ivins is an extremely sensitive suspect in the 2001 anthrax attacks".<ref>[http://foia.fbi.gov/amerithrax/847444.PDF FBI file #847444, page 67]</ref> Ivins was a scientist who worked at the government's biodefense laboratory at Fort Detrick in Frederick, Maryland. In June 2008, Ivins was told of the impending prosecution, and on July 27, 2008 it is claimed he committed suicide using an overdose of acetaminophen.<ref> [http://www.latimes.com/bal-te.anthrax03aug03,0,3970920.story Ivins case reignites debate on anthrax] LA Times 3 August 2008</ref> | Media reports focused on other possible suspects for years, but FBI files show that the investigation began to focus on Bruce Edwards Ivins as early as April 4, 2005, when Dr. Ivins told the FBI he would not talk any further without his lawyer present. On April 11, 2007, Dr. Ivins was put under periodic surveillance because "Bruce Edwards Ivins is an extremely sensitive suspect in the 2001 anthrax attacks".<ref>[http://foia.fbi.gov/amerithrax/847444.PDF FBI file #847444, page 67]</ref> Ivins was a scientist who worked at the government's biodefense laboratory at Fort Detrick in Frederick, Maryland. In June 2008, Ivins was told of the impending prosecution, and on July 27, 2008 it is claimed he committed suicide using an overdose of acetaminophen.<ref> [http://www.latimes.com/bal-te.anthrax03aug03,0,3970920.story Ivins case reignites debate on anthrax] LA Times 3 August 2008</ref> | ||
Revision as of 13:32, 3 July 2015
"“Lone nut”" Bruce Ivins    | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Born | April 22, 1946 |
| Died | July 29, 2008 (Age 62) |
| Victim of | premature death |
| Supposed perpetrator of | 2001 Anthrax attacks |
A biodefense researcher at Fort Detrick, Maryland who, the FBI concluded, sent anthrax letters with crude anti-Zionist messages to the US politicians who were holding up the rollback of civil liberties in the wake of 9/11. After an investigation costing around $100,000,000 Ivins was declared to be a lone nut responsible for the crime shortly after he was found dead. | |
Bruce Ivins was a microbiologist, vaccinologist and biodefense researcher at the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) in Fort Detrick, Maryland. He allegedly committed suicide by taking a drug overdose on July 29, 2008. He was named by the FBI as a "lone nut" behind the Amerithrax Anthrax Attacks just after 9/11.[1][2]No formal charges were ever filed against him for that crime, and no direct evidence of his involvement has been uncovered.[3]
Official Narrative
On August 6, 2008, federal prosecutors declared Ivins to be the (lone nut) culprit of the crime.[4] Two days later, senators Charles Grassley and Rush Holt called for hearings into the DOJ and FBI's handling of the investigation.[5][6] On February 19, 2010, the FBI formally closed its investigation. [7]
Media reports focused on other possible suspects for years, but FBI files show that the investigation began to focus on Bruce Edwards Ivins as early as April 4, 2005, when Dr. Ivins told the FBI he would not talk any further without his lawyer present. On April 11, 2007, Dr. Ivins was put under periodic surveillance because "Bruce Edwards Ivins is an extremely sensitive suspect in the 2001 anthrax attacks".[8] Ivins was a scientist who worked at the government's biodefense laboratory at Fort Detrick in Frederick, Maryland. In June 2008, Ivins was told of the impending prosecution, and on July 27, 2008 it is claimed he committed suicide using an overdose of acetaminophen.[9]
A review of the science used in the investigation is under way at the National Academy of Sciences. [10] Some information about the case related to Ivins' alleged mental problems is still "under seal." [11]
Related Quotation
| Page | Quote | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 Anthrax attacks | “If [Bruce Ivins] is the one who sent the letter, I do not believe in any way, shape or manner that he is the only person involved in this attack on Congress and the American people. I do not believe that at all. I believe there are others involved, either as accessories before or accessories after the fact. I believe that there are others out there, I believe there are others who could be charged with murder. I just want you to know how I feel about it, as one of the people who was aimed at in the attack."” | Patrick Leahy | September 2008 |
Related Document
| Title | Type | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document:All Roads Lead to Dark Winter | report | 1 April 2020 | Whitney Webb |
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.
References
- ↑
{{URL|example.com|optional display text}} - ↑
{{URL|example.com|optional display text}} - ↑ Greenwald, Glenn (2011-02-16) Serious doubt cast on FBI's anthrax case against Bruce Ivans, Salon.com
- ↑ U.S. officials declare researcher is anthrax killer CNN 6 August 2008
- ↑ Anthrax investigation should be investigated, congressmen say Associated Press 8 August 2008
- ↑ ISBN 978-1-60239-715-6 The Anthrax Letters: A Bioterrorism Expert Investigates the Attacks That Shocked America-Case Closed?
- ↑ F.B.I., Laying Out Evidence, Closes Anthrax Letters Case New York Times 19 February 2010
- ↑ FBI file #847444, page 67
- ↑ Ivins case reignites debate on anthrax LA Times 3 August 2008
- ↑ Science review underway
- ↑ FBI Summary Report Footnote pp. 8
