Difference between revisions of "Talk:David Kelly/Assassination"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (reply)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
:Your work-rate is impressive and I have no issues with any of the above. I have a lot of content-type material I want to get up and so prefer to spend less time on SMW-Development (except I will spend a bit of time on forms -event, person etc- since I spend so much time using the existing document one). I agree the SMW development IS essential though - and a serious positive descriminator from other aspiring outside-the-matrix sites. So, by all means,  press on with it. All the usual cautions apply and I'll be quick to offer an an opinion on changes with possible harmful potential. --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 07:42, 31 January 2014 (GMT)
 
:Your work-rate is impressive and I have no issues with any of the above. I have a lot of content-type material I want to get up and so prefer to spend less time on SMW-Development (except I will spend a bit of time on forms -event, person etc- since I spend so much time using the existing document one). I agree the SMW development IS essential though - and a serious positive descriminator from other aspiring outside-the-matrix sites. So, by all means,  press on with it. All the usual cautions apply and I'll be quick to offer an an opinion on changes with possible harmful potential. --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 07:42, 31 January 2014 (GMT)
 +
 +
== Template misbehaving ==
 +
 +
This should report that [[David Kelly/Death]] is an interest of [[David Halpin]]. I wonder why it doesn't... [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 19:26, 5 May 2015 (IST)

Revision as of 18:26, 5 May 2015

Tidying This

I've just split this off from the David Kelly page. This is essential to a sane use of SMW, since one is a person, one an event. Like with 9-11, I think this could be a good test-bed to see how well the existing SMW framework can express the ad hoc (i.e. human-readable) page which has been built so far. I made it a sub-page - not essential but it seems like a sensible way to help structure things, possibly a good practice which we can reflect when creating new material.

In line with the (newly minted) WikiSpooks:Templates policy, I zapped the single use KellyDocs template. There is still a rather messy pile of links left. I wonder whether they can all be fitted neatly into the existing SMWDocs framework, or whether the time has come to expand that a little... Robin (talk) 06:58, 31 January 2014 (GMT)

Your work-rate is impressive and I have no issues with any of the above. I have a lot of content-type material I want to get up and so prefer to spend less time on SMW-Development (except I will spend a bit of time on forms -event, person etc- since I spend so much time using the existing document one). I agree the SMW development IS essential though - and a serious positive descriminator from other aspiring outside-the-matrix sites. So, by all means, press on with it. All the usual cautions apply and I'll be quick to offer an an opinion on changes with possible harmful potential. --Peter P (talk) 07:42, 31 January 2014 (GMT)

Template misbehaving

This should report that David Kelly/Death is an interest of David Halpin. I wonder why it doesn't... Robin (talk) 19:26, 5 May 2015 (IST)