Difference between revisions of "Socialist Review"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Text replacement - "|Description" to "|description") |
m (Text replacement - "|Image" to "|image") |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Start=1950 | |Start=1950 | ||
|description=The monthly magazine of the British Socialist Workers Party | |description=The monthly magazine of the British Socialist Workers Party | ||
| − | | | + | |image=Socialist Review.jpg |
| − | | | + | |imageWidth= |
|OwnerDetail= | |OwnerDetail= | ||
|Wikipedia=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist Review | |Wikipedia=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist Review | ||
Revision as of 13:49, 13 June 2014
Documents sourced from Socialist Review
| Title | Type | Subject(s) | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document:Armed and Dangerous | article | Arms-to-Iraq | 1 March 1996 | Paul Foot | Arguments about whether ministers should resign are not the main point of the Scott Report, says Paul Foot. The real dynamite is in the connection between government and the arms industry - and the level of deception involved |
| Document:Re-living the war in an Irish Town | interview | 17 April 2005 | Pat Stack Richard Norton-Taylor |
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.
