Difference between revisions of "User talk:AgentTorange"
m (→Talk pages: Reddit) |
AgentTorange (talk | contribs) (i dont think have to explain myself here) |
||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
- 4chan and 8chan strangely not attributed at all to these incidences, not anywhere ive seen at least. How? Why? | - 4chan and 8chan strangely not attributed at all to these incidences, not anywhere ive seen at least. How? Why? | ||
− | - Did the Authors of "Nobody Died at Sandy Hook" instigate this on their website, memoryholeblog.org, were they ever associated at all with what happened, being that they were the original progenitors of the 'nobody died' narrative, and their leader, Wolfgang something, had compelling credentials. I'm pretty sure Wolfgang at least has since died. | + | - Did the Authors of "Nobody Died at Sandy Hook" instigate this on their website, memoryholeblog.org, were they ever associated at all with what happened, being that they were the original progenitors of the 'nobody died' narrative, and their leader, Wolfgang something, had compelling credentials. <s>I'm pretty sure Wolfgang at least has since died. </s> |
+ | ==Halbig lives== | ||
+ | Wolfgang Halbig is not only alive but it tuns out that before alex jones, Halbig and most his peers have all been convicted of crimes related to the harrassment of sandy hook parents, and not in civil cout, although I dont believe anyone has done much time other than Halbiig | ||
+ | |||
+ | Another figurehead, steve santili, or something like that, was also a member of the oathkeepers, and was invloved in the ammon bundy standoff, and later confirmed to be an FBI Informant (not an agent) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Most of this info comming from sandyhookfacts.com. The author clearly has a bias, but it is readily acknowledged and self-proclaimed. Soime of the early articles merely skeptical, but as the guy digs furthe into halbig, the aticles become much bolder in deameanor. It's like what frankreport.com was to the NXIVM scandal when that was going on, in a way. This guy, or his mates, basically chekced into a lot of the "Nobody died" arguments requiing info that most people are incapable of or dont know how to attain it.. | ||
+ | |||
+ | - There's two important takeaways to the "nobody died" shit getting so outta control | ||
+ | ##The 'nobody died' theory implies that while forces in our government may be willing to orchestate a fake school shooting to meet an agenda, they are not evil enough to orchestate or oversee the actual murder of innocent childen; which is patently false. | ||
+ | ## It should be taken into consideration that | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | 1. | ||
- I've never seen any of the aformentioned discussed or explored anywhere. Wolfgang's involvement indeed seems to have been memory holed, though that may just be in effort not to draw more people towards his research and claims. What is the likelihood the memory hole blog people,including wolfgang, were just narciccists capitalising on a tragedy, what are the odds they sincerely believed nobody died at sandy hook, how convincing is their evidence, and if the concepts introduced as evidence are convincing, how much of it is presented out of context, with lies of omission, or simply untrue? | - I've never seen any of the aformentioned discussed or explored anywhere. Wolfgang's involvement indeed seems to have been memory holed, though that may just be in effort not to draw more people towards his research and claims. What is the likelihood the memory hole blog people,including wolfgang, were just narciccists capitalising on a tragedy, what are the odds they sincerely believed nobody died at sandy hook, how convincing is their evidence, and if the concepts introduced as evidence are convincing, how much of it is presented out of context, with lies of omission, or simply untrue? | ||
Line 58: | Line 72: | ||
<nowiki><nowiki>[[Page link]|with different words]]</nowiki></nowiki> | <nowiki><nowiki>[[Page link]|with different words]]</nowiki></nowiki> | ||
− | The only difference [[Use talk:AgentTorange|This should go to page you're on now | + | The only difference [[Use talk:AgentTorange|This should go to page you're on now] |
---- | ---- | ||
==Brainstorming== | ==Brainstorming== | ||
Line 80: | Line 94: | ||
Sorry, all points noted. Not trying to be a douche. cant make any promises on the ~s, but i'll try. [[User:AgentTorange | AgentTorange]] ([[User talk:AgentTorange|talk]]) {[[User:AgentTorange#My_Key|my key]]} 13:06, 28 November 2022 (UTC) | Sorry, all points noted. Not trying to be a douche. cant make any promises on the ~s, but i'll try. [[User:AgentTorange | AgentTorange]] ([[User talk:AgentTorange|talk]]) {[[User:AgentTorange#My_Key|my key]]} 13:06, 28 November 2022 (UTC) | ||
No need to say sorry! Btw, brainstorming or sharing interesting things you find here on reddit would be a good start while you're new here. IF you want to, you could use our Wikispooks account<ref>https://www.reddit.com/user/WikispooksOfficial/</ref>, but you can also use an own acc if you want. Think about it. [[User:Jun|Jun]] ([[User talk:Jun|talk]]) 20:51, 28 November 2022 (UTC) | No need to say sorry! Btw, brainstorming or sharing interesting things you find here on reddit would be a good start while you're new here. IF you want to, you could use our Wikispooks account<ref>https://www.reddit.com/user/WikispooksOfficial/</ref>, but you can also use an own acc if you want. Think about it. [[User:Jun|Jun]] ([[User talk:Jun|talk]]) 20:51, 28 November 2022 (UTC) | ||
+ | [ |
Revision as of 12:05, 4 December 2022
Contents
Welcome to Wikispooks!
We're glad you came. There's lots to do.
The Community portal is probably the best place to start for new users. To add a Wikispooks search facility to your browser, go here. If you've got a topic you're itching to write about, just dive in. If you're not sure where to start, you can introduce yourself by editing either this page or your user page. Robin (talk) 20:01, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Reminders
Port Arthur, Dunblane, Sandy Hook, Christchurch
I'll take notes here of things I'd typically put in the Talk pages of other wiki's, since wikispooks does not seem to have them on articles
Feel free to comment, criticize, though id prefer u didnt vandalise
- Juxtapositions b/t Dunblane school massacre and Sandy Hook should def be explored, as well as Port Arthur massacre, which occured the same year though was not a school shooting. Explanations for why New Zealand's shooting resulting in mass disarmament didn't occur until 20 years later should also be considered
-ex. Discrepancies in reports regarding the shooting skill of Port Arthur shooter, the range at which he shot his victims, and the strategic (between the eyes, no chance of survival) places he managed to hit them. Some say the shots were point blank, which would not be impressive or farfetched, others say considering circumstances, point blank range of most or many shots seems unlikely, meaning the shooter's marksmanship exceeded the skillset that would be expected of someone like him
- Similar discrepancies in case of Adam Lanza, though in his case we know at least he had a lot of experience shooting before hand
-Port Arthur Shooter seems almost ceerainly suffered from asperger's. Dunblane shooter definitely weird, not necessarily autistic.
-These events, with the exception of sandy hook, are rarely mentioned in US media. Which is odd considering, they'd serve as a good narrative in favor of disarmament, considering that lone wolf shootings since the respective events in Australia and Britain and the entire UK have been either non-existent, or close to it since
-How much these incidents were invoked in Britain (or UK as whole) and Australia in the aftermath of Sandy Hook would be interesting
- Parent's of victims of Dunblane shooting claim to have reached out to Sandy Hook Parents. Some parents of Dunblane Victims say they have helped Americans in their efforts to "change US gun laws (aka disarm americans)https://web.archive.org/web/20210311225221if_/https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/14282766/thomas-hamilton-dunblane-shooter-killer/ <<<<way towards bottom for dunblane parents comments
-what connection, if any, can be drawn between the Dunblane Parents' contacting Sandy Hook Parent's and the supposed droves of conspiracy theorists who allegedly harrassed Sandy Hook parents - Any information regarding the people who harassed sandy hook parents, restraining orders filed, arrests made for violation of those orders, idenitites of harrassers already in the public domain, any figures regarding number of harassers, when the harrassment began, how it progressed - where it was discussed, how the people who called the parents found the information (were the parents doxxed or did harrassers find information independently, where the harrassers congregated and came up with the idea to start harrassing.
- There has always been a glaring link missing in this narrative, considering, afaik, there is no audio/video of Alex Jones telling his fans to contact these parents. This means the plan was hatched elsewhere online, unless we are to believe these harrassers all acted independently, w/o influencing one another in any way.
- when did media reports of phone calls begin, where did media's info of calls first come from, did frequency of calls and number of people calling increase after media coverage, or was there no significant change? How many people were actually calling? Who were they? Where did they congregate, what were their influences, where did they come from, what did they hope to gain from calling, what was their demeanor when they called?
- I have to assume that that at least some harrassers were involved in the Q movement. What, if any,crossosver can be observed? what can be gleened from this
- 4chan and 8chan strangely not attributed at all to these incidences, not anywhere ive seen at least. How? Why?
- Did the Authors of "Nobody Died at Sandy Hook" instigate this on their website, memoryholeblog.org, were they ever associated at all with what happened, being that they were the original progenitors of the 'nobody died' narrative, and their leader, Wolfgang something, had compelling credentials.I'm pretty sure Wolfgang at least has since died.
Halbig lives
Wolfgang Halbig is not only alive but it tuns out that before alex jones, Halbig and most his peers have all been convicted of crimes related to the harrassment of sandy hook parents, and not in civil cout, although I dont believe anyone has done much time other than Halbiig
Another figurehead, steve santili, or something like that, was also a member of the oathkeepers, and was invloved in the ammon bundy standoff, and later confirmed to be an FBI Informant (not an agent)
Most of this info comming from sandyhookfacts.com. The author clearly has a bias, but it is readily acknowledged and self-proclaimed. Soime of the early articles merely skeptical, but as the guy digs furthe into halbig, the aticles become much bolder in deameanor. It's like what frankreport.com was to the NXIVM scandal when that was going on, in a way. This guy, or his mates, basically chekced into a lot of the "Nobody died" arguments requiing info that most people are incapable of or dont know how to attain it..
- There's two important takeaways to the "nobody died" shit getting so outta control
- The 'nobody died' theory implies that while forces in our government may be willing to orchestate a fake school shooting to meet an agenda, they are not evil enough to orchestate or oversee the actual murder of innocent childen; which is patently false.
- It should be taken into consideration that
1.
- I've never seen any of the aformentioned discussed or explored anywhere. Wolfgang's involvement indeed seems to have been memory holed, though that may just be in effort not to draw more people towards his research and claims. What is the likelihood the memory hole blog people,including wolfgang, were just narciccists capitalising on a tragedy, what are the odds they sincerely believed nobody died at sandy hook, how convincing is their evidence, and if the concepts introduced as evidence are convincing, how much of it is presented out of context, with lies of omission, or simply untrue?
-what other mass shooting incidents in other countries have playe an inextricable role in the disarmament of those countries and/or others (Dunblane led to disarmament of entire UK, which is 4[?] countries)
- New zealand shooter almost certainly not aspergers or autistic
- For all shooters - were they medicated, or recently taken off any medication at time of shooting?
italic
bold
'bold & Italic'
<nowiki>[[Page link]|with different words]]</nowiki>
The only difference [[Use talk:AgentTorange|This should go to page you're on now]
Brainstorming
One way i like to brainstorm is to think of answerable questions i have about a topic. and write them free-assocation kinda.
Fee free to try it here, I'd love to see what you come up with:
Start Here
Talk pages
Hello there,
Small note, if would be more effective if you'd tag someone when you use talk pages, as we don't automatically answer it like it's an public Facebook channel. We actually won't if we're not tagged as we're understaffed. Tagging is beginning the post with "!User:AgentTorange!" without the exclamation marks ofc. Therefore it maybe also would be better if you'd use your registered user name to sign off your posts instead of "my key" "sup d". Maybe I know who you are, but others don't. It's just a suggestion, think about it.
2. You also forgot on two talk pages to sign off using the 4 "~". In case someone wants to brainstorm with you, they won't know who you are. Please don't forget to do that.
3. Please use your own page for "secret pages", we are struggling to meet server costs, and adding secret pages with little known function doesn't help that. If you want to test all the templates or codes, would you be willing to your own user page or use template:test? Jun (talk) 09:13, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Sorry, all points noted. Not trying to be a douche. cant make any promises on the ~s, but i'll try. AgentTorange (talk) {my key} 13:06, 28 November 2022 (UTC) No need to say sorry! Btw, brainstorming or sharing interesting things you find here on reddit would be a good start while you're new here. IF you want to, you could use our Wikispooks account[1], but you can also use an own acc if you want. Think about it. Jun (talk) 20:51, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
[