Difference between revisions of "File talk:Conspiracy Chart 2021.png"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Comment)
 
m (Chart.)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
The second I first saw this I was fascinated, so I thought it was worth adding to [[Wikispooks]]. The most interesting ones are at the top, some of which I have never heard of. Maybe it would be an idea to make an article for all of them? [[User:UKpeacelibertyfreedom|UKpeacelibertyfreedom]] ([[User talk:UKpeacelibertyfreedom|talk]]) 14:31, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 
The second I first saw this I was fascinated, so I thought it was worth adding to [[Wikispooks]]. The most interesting ones are at the top, some of which I have never heard of. Maybe it would be an idea to make an article for all of them? [[User:UKpeacelibertyfreedom|UKpeacelibertyfreedom]] ([[User talk:UKpeacelibertyfreedom|talk]]) 14:31, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 +
 +
Sure. Remember to use the format from |concepts. And keep in mind that Richards only holds a degree in environmental science, in particular the climate, which points to her being more of a propagandist (add that to |constitutes) as her, so best to also mention that. As she never(?) released peer-reviewed studies and doesn't explain how the chart is made - the chart being her only noticeably work. Maybe also add it to [[third rail topics]] and [[TV]] or [[consolidation of big media]] in a small section explaining "allowed" and non-allowed conspiracies.

Revision as of 16:44, 15 December 2021

The second I first saw this I was fascinated, so I thought it was worth adding to Wikispooks. The most interesting ones are at the top, some of which I have never heard of. Maybe it would be an idea to make an article for all of them? UKpeacelibertyfreedom (talk) 14:31, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Sure. Remember to use the format from |concepts. And keep in mind that Richards only holds a degree in environmental science, in particular the climate, which points to her being more of a propagandist (add that to |constitutes) as her, so best to also mention that. As she never(?) released peer-reviewed studies and doesn't explain how the chart is made - the chart being her only noticeably work. Maybe also add it to third rail topics and TV or consolidation of big media in a small section explaining "allowed" and non-allowed conspiracies.