Difference between revisions of "James Doleman"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Inaugurating) |
m |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|constitutes=reporter | |constitutes=reporter | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | '''James Doleman''' is a court and politics reporter at the ''[[Byline Times]]''.<ref>''[https:// | + | '''James Doleman''' is a court and politics reporter<ref>''[https://twitter.com/jamesdoleman "James Doleman on Twitter"]''</ref> at the ''[[Byline Times]]''.<ref>''[https://bylinetimes.com/author/jamesdoleman/ "James Doleman at the Byline Times"]''</ref> |
==Jigsaw identification== | ==Jigsaw identification== | ||
| − | In [[Scotland]], unlike [[England]], no automatic right of anonymity in sexual assault cases exists. It has to be specifically ordered by the judge in each case, something that didn’t happen until the first day of the [[Alex Salmond]] trial after James Doleman of ''Byline Times'' directly named one of the complainers in a tweet, for which major breach he was merely admonished and excluded from the court on subsequent days.<ref>''[[Document:Lady Dorrian's Law]]''</ref> | + | In [[Scotland]], unlike [[England]], no automatic right of anonymity in sexual assault cases exists. It has to be specifically ordered by the judge in each case, something that didn’t happen until the first day of the [[Alex Salmond]] trial after James Doleman of ''[[Byline Times]]'' directly named one of the complainers in a tweet, for which major breach he was merely admonished and excluded from the court on subsequent days.<ref>''[[Document:Lady Dorrian's Law]]''</ref> |
| − | (This is despite the fact that ''Byline Times'' is not subject to [https://www.ipso.co.uk/ IPSO adjudication] and indeed calls the organisation a “sham regulator”, and therefore by [[Lady Dorrian]]’s own ruling she should have treated Doleman more harshly than “proper” journalists.)<ref>''[https://archive.is/i67JZ "IPSO AND ARBITRATION: DON’T GET FOOLED AGAIN"]''</ref> | + | (This is despite the fact that ''[[Byline Times]]'' is not subject to [https://www.ipso.co.uk/ IPSO adjudication] and indeed calls the organisation a “sham regulator”, and therefore by [[Lady Dorrian]]’s own ruling she should have treated Doleman more harshly than “proper” journalists.)<ref>''[https://archive.is/i67JZ "IPSO AND ARBITRATION: DON’T GET FOOLED AGAIN"]''</ref> |
{{SMWDocs}} | {{SMWDocs}} | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
Latest revision as of 11:30, 6 August 2021
 James Doleman  (reporter) | |
|---|---|
.jpg) | |
James Doleman is a court and politics reporter[1] at the Byline Times.[2]
Jigsaw identification
In Scotland, unlike England, no automatic right of anonymity in sexual assault cases exists. It has to be specifically ordered by the judge in each case, something that didn’t happen until the first day of the Alex Salmond trial after James Doleman of Byline Times directly named one of the complainers in a tweet, for which major breach he was merely admonished and excluded from the court on subsequent days.[3]
(This is despite the fact that Byline Times is not subject to IPSO adjudication and indeed calls the organisation a “sham regulator”, and therefore by Lady Dorrian’s own ruling she should have treated Doleman more harshly than “proper” journalists.)[4]
Related Document
| Title | Type | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document:Lady Dorrian's Law | blog post | 30 July 2021 | Stuart Campbell | The ruinous determination of the Scottish Government and the Scottish judicial system to put someone, anyone connected to Alex Salmond in jail out of the First Minister’s demented paranoia and sheer malice has had many disastrous outcomes, for individuals, taxpayers and the country as a whole. |
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.
