Difference between revisions of "Lawfare"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This page imported content from Wikipedia on 14 March 2019.
Wikipedia is not affiliated with Wikispooks. Original page source here
(Importing from WP and expanding) |
(Adding image) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Concept | {{Concept | ||
| + | |image=Brooke_Goldstein.jpg | ||
| + | |image_width=240px | ||
| + | |image_caption=Executive Director [[Brooke Goldstein]] | ||
|wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawfare | |wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawfare | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 15:49, 14 March 2019
 Lawfare    | |
|---|---|
 Executive Director Brooke Goldstein | |
| Interest of | • Brooke Goldstein • Mikhail Lesin • Silvina Romano |
Lawfare is a form of war consisting of the use of the legal system against an enemy, such as by damaging or delegitimising them, tying up their time or winning a public relations victory.[1][2] The term is a portmanteau of the words law and warfare.
The Lawfare Project defines lawfare as "the abuse of Western laws and judicial systems to achieve strategic military or political ends".[3] From this perspective, lawfare consists of "the negative manipulation of international and national human rights laws to accomplish purposes other than, or contrary to, those for which they were originally enacted".
In a 2010 speech on the topic, Lawfare Project Director Brooke Goldstein elaborated:
- Lawfare is about more than just delegitimising a state's right to defend itself; it is about the abuse of the law and our judicial systems to undermine the very principles they stands for: the rule of law, the sanctity of innocent human life, and the right to free speech. Lawfare is not something in which persons engage in the pursuit of justice; it is a negative undertaking and must be defined as such to have any real meaning. Otherwise, we risk diluting the phenomenon and feeding the inability to distinguish between what is the correct application of the law, on the one hand, and what is lawfare, on the other. Because that is the essence of the issue here, how do we distinguish between that which constitutes a constructive, legitimate legal battle (even if the legal battle is against us and inconvenient) from that which is a counterproductive perversion of the law, which should be allocated no precedent? The delineation is not as simple as some may like to make it; that is, that lawsuits against terrorists are good, and legal actions against the U.S. and Israel are bad. Now, the question is not "who is the target", but "what is the intention" behind the legal action: is it to pursue justice, to apply the law in the interests of freedom and democracy, or is the intent to undermine the system of laws being manipulated?[4]
An example
| Page name | Description |
|---|---|
| Foreign Corrupt Practices Act | From careful beginnings has become a major tool of statecraft |
Related Quotation
| Page | Quote | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silvina Romano | “Lawfare is a political war through the courts, which uses legal tools improperly for political persecution, which uses the law as a weapon to destroy the adversary. Lawfare operates from high places through a judicial apparatus that rises above the Legislative and Executive Power, expanding the margin of maneuver and power of the judges, paving the way for a growing “juristocracy”.” | Silvina Romano | December 2020 |
Related Documents
| Title | Type | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document:Lawyers For Israel Oppose Conscience | blog post | 20 May 2023 | Craig Murray | Convictions based on “intent” to do something you have not actually done, are generally dubious. The Shenstone defendants have been told by Judge Chambers they will get prison sentences. Expect these to be vicious. |
| Document:What is UK Lawyers for Israel’s relationship to the Israeli government | Article | 12 March 2019 | Hilary Aked | Israeli diplomat Shai Masot – who worked for the anti-BDS Israeli Ministry of Strategic Affairs in London – was recorded in Al Jazeera’s 2017 undercover documentary The Lobby saying of groups such as UKLFI: "It’s good to leave those organisations independent. But we help them, actually." |
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.
References
- ↑ "Is Lawfare Worth Defining?" (PDF). Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law. 43 (1). 11 September 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 August 2011. Cite uses deprecated parameter
|deadurl=(help)Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css must have content model "Sanitized CSS" for TemplateStyles (current model is "Scribunto"). - ↑ "p. 55"
- ↑ "The Lawfare Project: What is Lawfare?". Archived from the original on 19 April 2013. Retrieved 17 July 2013. Cite uses deprecated parameter
|deadurl=(help)Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css must have content model "Sanitized CSS" for TemplateStyles (current model is "Scribunto"). - ↑ Brooke Goldstein (5 November 2010). "Lawfare: Real Threat or Illusion". Retrieved 25 November 2014.Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css must have content model "Sanitized CSS" for TemplateStyles (current model is "Scribunto").
This page imported content from Wikipedia on 14 March 2019.Wikipedia is not affiliated with Wikispooks. Original page source here
