Difference between revisions of "Wikipedia:Conspiracy theory"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(UnUse WPProblems template)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{WpPage
 
{{WpPage
|WpIntro=The official [[9/11]] explanation is a ''theory'' about a ''conspiracy'', but is never described as a ''conspiracy theory''. The phrase has been [http://www.unwelcomeguests.net/561 deliberately given a perjorative meaning since the 1960s] by the establishment, keen to quell any suspicions that [[MSM|commercially controlled media]] are not as objective as they claim.
+
|WpIntro=The wikipedia article is wordy, biased and unclear. The phrase has been [http://www.unwelcomeguests.net/561 deliberately given a pejorative meaning since the 1960s] by the establishment, keen to quell any suspicions that [[MSM|commercially controlled media]] are not as objective as they claim. Note that while the official [[9/11]] story is a ''theory'' about a ''conspiracy'', commercial media never describe it as a ''conspiracy theory''.
 +
|WPBias=Yes
 +
|WPUnclear=Yes
 
|Stub=No
 
|Stub=No
 
|WsLink1=Document:911 and the Orwellian Redefinition of Conspiracy Theory
 
|WsLink1=Document:911 and the Orwellian Redefinition of Conspiracy Theory
Line 16: Line 18:
 
|ExLink1=http://www.unwelcomeguests.net/561
 
|ExLink1=http://www.unwelcomeguests.net/561
 
|ExLink1Name=$100,000,000 to Crack A Lone Nut?
 
|ExLink1Name=$100,000,000 to Crack A Lone Nut?
|ExLink1Desc=A radio show including Mark Crispin Miller on the [[CIA]]'s creation of 'conspiracy theory' as a perjorative
+
|ExLink1Desc=A radio show including Mark Crispin Miller on the [[CIA]]'s creation of 'conspiracy theory' as a pejorative
 
|ExLink2=http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Conspiracy_theory
 
|ExLink2=http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Conspiracy_theory
 
|ExLink2Name=Conspiracy theory
 
|ExLink2Name=Conspiracy theory

Revision as of 10:19, 14 June 2012


WpIcon32.png Conspiracy theory






Bias Obfuscation  The wikipedia article is wordy, biased and unclear. The phrase has been deliberately given a pejorative meaning since the 1960s by the establishment, keen to quell any suspicions that commercially controlled media are not as objective as they claim. Note that while the official 9/11 story is a theory about a conspiracy, commercial media never describe it as a conspiracy theory.


Related Wikispooks Pages

Document:911 and the Orwellian Redefinition of Conspiracy Theory Document:911 and the Orwellian Redefinition of Conspiracy Theory - While we were not watching, conspiracy theory has undergone Orwellian redefinition.
Document:Conspiracies and Conspiracism Document:Conspiracies and Conspiracism - A very effective rebuttal of the claims of Chip Bertlet in his book "Toxic To Democracy: Conspiracy Theories, Demonization, & Scapegoating" which uses the terms 'conspiracy theory' and 'Conspiracist' in their now de-rigeur pejorative establishment sense
The Power of Unreason The Power of Unreason - Critique of an Establishment paper on 'Conspiracy theories' sub-titled: Conspiracy theories, extremism and counter-terrorism
Document:Democratic State v Deep State Document:Democratic State v Deep State - A seminal paper by Norwegian academic Ola Tunander
Document:Beyond Conspiracy Theory Document:Beyond Conspiracy Theory - Another seminal paper by Lance DeHaven-Smith. Subtitled "Patterns of High Crime in American Government" and originally published in the February 2010 edition of American Behavioral Scientist
:Category:Conspiracy Theory Category:Conspiracy Theory - A collection of pages, documents and articles filed under the category 'Conspiracy Theory'

External Links