Difference between revisions of "George W. Bush/Torture Indictment"
m |
(linkify) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | '''This article provides information about criminal proceedings intended to have been filed against George W Bush in Geneva by the [http://ccrjustice.org/ourcases/current-cases/bush-torture-indictment Centre for Constitutional Rights] on 7 February 2011. It is intended to be updated as and when the matter progresses or other events and information relevant to it or related prosecution attempts become available | + | {{event |
| + | |type=legal | ||
| + | |start=2011 | ||
| + | |description=The Center for Constitutional Rights and the Canadian Centre for International Justice have been taking legal action against George W Bush for his role in authorizing and overseeing his administration's well-documented torture program. | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | ''This article provides information about criminal proceedings intended to have been filed against George W Bush in Geneva by the [http://ccrjustice.org/ourcases/current-cases/bush-torture-indictment Centre for Constitutional Rights] on 7 February 2011. It is intended to be updated as and when the matter progresses or other events and information relevant to it or related prosecution attempts become available'' | ||
==Bush Torture Indictment== | ==Bush Torture Indictment== | ||
| Line 5: | Line 10: | ||
On February 7, 2011, two torture victims were to have filed criminal complaints for torture against former president George W. Bush in Geneva, who was due to speak at an event there on February 12th. On the eve of the filing of the complaints, George Bush canceled his trip. Swiss law requires the presence of the alleged torturer on Swiss soil before a preliminary investigation can be opened. The complaints could not be filed after Bush canceled, as the basis for jurisdiction no longer existed. | On February 7, 2011, two torture victims were to have filed criminal complaints for torture against former president George W. Bush in Geneva, who was due to speak at an event there on February 12th. On the eve of the filing of the complaints, George Bush canceled his trip. Swiss law requires the presence of the alleged torturer on Swiss soil before a preliminary investigation can be opened. The complaints could not be filed after Bush canceled, as the basis for jurisdiction no longer existed. | ||
| − | These two complaints are part of a larger effort to ensure accountability for torturers, including former U.S. officials. So on February 7, 2011, CCR publicly released the "Preliminary Bush Torture Indictment." | + | These two complaints are part of a larger effort to ensure accountability for torturers, including former U.S. officials. So on February 7, 2011, CCR publicly released the "Preliminary Bush Torture Indictment." This document presents fundamental aspects of the case against George Bush for torture, and a preliminary legal analysis of his liability for torture and a response to some anticipated defenses. This document will be updated as developments warrant. The exhibit list contains references to more than 2,500 pages of supporting material. |
===Status=== | ===Status=== | ||
| − | The Preliminary Bush Torture Indictment was prepared so that it could be used for individual victims to file cases against George Bush in any country where the Convention Against Torture provides jurisdiction. | + | The Preliminary Bush Torture Indictment was prepared so that it could be used for individual victims to file cases against George Bush in any country where the [[United Nations Convention against Torture|UN Convention Against Torture]] provides jurisdiction. |
===Description=== | ===Description=== | ||
| Line 16: | Line 21: | ||
Manfred Nowak, former UN Special Rapporteur on Torture (2004-2010), was to submit an expert opinion on the complaints concluding that the conduct to which both plaintiffs were subjected constitutes torture, that Switzerland had an obligation to open a preliminary investigation, and that George W. Bush enjoys no immunity. | Manfred Nowak, former UN Special Rapporteur on Torture (2004-2010), was to submit an expert opinion on the complaints concluding that the conduct to which both plaintiffs were subjected constitutes torture, that Switzerland had an obligation to open a preliminary investigation, and that George W. Bush enjoys no immunity. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==2013 Developments== | ||
| + | After some delaying tactics, the Canadian government replied in October 2013, arguing not that Bush enjoyed any immunity under law as a former Head of State or that the allegations of torture against him were frivolous or politically motivated. Instead Canada argued that it was not worth pursuing an investigation or prosecution of Bush because, the Canadian authorities would not get the necessary assistance from the [[United States]]. Canada argued that any evidence "of torture by the U.S. government resides, for the most part, within the very center of the U.S. administration and with present and former U.S. officials residing in the United States."<ref name="CCRjustice">http://ccrjustice.org/ourcases/current-cases/bush-torture-indictment</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==References== | ||
| + | {{reflist}} | ||
{{BushIndictment}} | {{BushIndictment}} | ||
| Line 22: | Line 33: | ||
[[Category:War Criminals]] | [[Category:War Criminals]] | ||
[[Category:US Presidents]] | [[Category:US Presidents]] | ||
| − | [[Category: George Walker Bush]] | + | [[Category:George Walker Bush]] |
Revision as of 05:43, 5 April 2014
| Date | 2011 - Present |
|---|---|
| Type |  legal |
| Description | The Center for Constitutional Rights and the Canadian Centre for International Justice have been taking legal action against George W Bush for his role in authorizing and overseeing his administration's well-documented torture program. |
This article provides information about criminal proceedings intended to have been filed against George W Bush in Geneva by the Centre for Constitutional Rights on 7 February 2011. It is intended to be updated as and when the matter progresses or other events and information relevant to it or related prosecution attempts become available
Contents
Bush Torture Indictment
Synopsis
On February 7, 2011, two torture victims were to have filed criminal complaints for torture against former president George W. Bush in Geneva, who was due to speak at an event there on February 12th. On the eve of the filing of the complaints, George Bush canceled his trip. Swiss law requires the presence of the alleged torturer on Swiss soil before a preliminary investigation can be opened. The complaints could not be filed after Bush canceled, as the basis for jurisdiction no longer existed.
These two complaints are part of a larger effort to ensure accountability for torturers, including former U.S. officials. So on February 7, 2011, CCR publicly released the "Preliminary Bush Torture Indictment." This document presents fundamental aspects of the case against George Bush for torture, and a preliminary legal analysis of his liability for torture and a response to some anticipated defenses. This document will be updated as developments warrant. The exhibit list contains references to more than 2,500 pages of supporting material.
Status
The Preliminary Bush Torture Indictment was prepared so that it could be used for individual victims to file cases against George Bush in any country where the UN Convention Against Torture provides jurisdiction.
Description
There is global support for the victims of torture under the Bush administration to seek justice and accountability. CCR worked with the Berlin-based European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights to prepare the case in Switzerland, and had support from the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH).
The individual complaints that were set to be filed in Geneva on February 7, 2011 were supported by a letter from more than 60 human rights organizations and prominent individuals calling for the prosecution of George W. Bush for torture, including former UN Special Rapporteur on Torture, Theo van Boven, UN Special Rapporteur on Independence of Judges and Lawyers, Leandro Despouy, and Nobel Peace Prize recipients Shirin Ebadi and Pérez Esquivel. A number of the human rights organizations which signed on are facing the on-going harms of the “counterterrorism” policies advanced under the Bush administration and then adopted or employed in their own countries.
Manfred Nowak, former UN Special Rapporteur on Torture (2004-2010), was to submit an expert opinion on the complaints concluding that the conduct to which both plaintiffs were subjected constitutes torture, that Switzerland had an obligation to open a preliminary investigation, and that George W. Bush enjoys no immunity.
2013 Developments
After some delaying tactics, the Canadian government replied in October 2013, arguing not that Bush enjoyed any immunity under law as a former Head of State or that the allegations of torture against him were frivolous or politically motivated. Instead Canada argued that it was not worth pursuing an investigation or prosecution of Bush because, the Canadian authorities would not get the necessary assistance from the United States. Canada argued that any evidence "of torture by the U.S. government resides, for the most part, within the very center of the U.S. administration and with present and former U.S. officials residing in the United States."[1]
