Difference between revisions of "Template talk:WPAdjunct"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Notes on the new icons)
 
Line 8: Line 8:
 
== Icons ==
 
== Icons ==
  
I just added icons, which feels right to me, giving regular readers a quick fix on what the problem is. We might want to look at Wikipedia for inspiration about which icons to use. Maybe make a list here:
+
I just added icons, which feels right to me, giving regular readers a quick fix on what the problem is, like [[Wikipedia]] itself. We might want to look there for inspiration. Actually, I'm wondering about a Wikipedia+ upgrade/bespoke Wikispooks addon, to pop up a little warning like this at the top of Wikipedia pages. [[User:Robin|Robin]] 03:08, 8 June 2012 (IST)
 
 
* Bias - A distorted WP logo with some pieces much bigger than others?
 
* Omissions - A WP logo with lots of holes
 

Latest revision as of 02:08, 8 June 2012

The Idea Is...

To use this as a way to help standardise our assessment of/relationships to Wikipedia pages. A taxonomy of Wikipedia Problems would help. In the meantime, feel free to adjust this template e.g. by adding extra reasons, or modifying the reason text. I feel like leaving the option to use custom text is a good choice, but the aim is to categorise the problems. Maybe later add fancy icons etc. to help regular readers.

Robin 16:44, 10 April 2012 (IST)

I like the finished effect, eg here! Toolbox 09:49, 6 June 2012 (IST)

Icons

I just added icons, which feels right to me, giving regular readers a quick fix on what the problem is, like Wikipedia itself. We might want to look there for inspiration. Actually, I'm wondering about a Wikipedia+ upgrade/bespoke Wikispooks addon, to pop up a little warning like this at the top of Wikipedia pages. Robin 03:08, 8 June 2012 (IST)