Difference between revisions of "Template talk:WPAdjunct"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New categories welcome)
 
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
[[User:Robin|Robin]] 16:44, 10 April 2012 (IST)
 
[[User:Robin|Robin]] 16:44, 10 April 2012 (IST)
 +
 +
== Icons ==
 +
 +
I just added icons, which feels right to me, giving regular readers a quick fix on what the problem is. We might want to look at Wikipedia for inspiration about which icons to use. Maybe make a list here:
 +
 +
* Bias - A distorted WP logo with some pieces much bigger than others?
 +
* Omissions - A WP logo with lots of holes

Revision as of 05:18, 6 June 2012

The Idea Is...

To use this as a way to help standardise our assessment of/relationships to Wikipedia pages. A taxonomy of Wikipedia Problems would help. In the meantime, feel free to adjust this template e.g. by adding extra reasons, or modifying the reason text. I feel like leaving the option to use custom text is a good choice, but the aim is to categorise the problems. Maybe later add fancy icons etc. to help regular readers.

Robin 16:44, 10 April 2012 (IST)

Icons

I just added icons, which feels right to me, giving regular readers a quick fix on what the problem is. We might want to look at Wikipedia for inspiration about which icons to use. Maybe make a list here:

  • Bias - A distorted WP logo with some pieces much bigger than others?
  • Omissions - A WP logo with lots of holes