Difference between revisions of "Richard Lambert"
(image) |
(image) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|constitutes=whistleblower | |constitutes=whistleblower | ||
|description=The agent in charge of the FBI's Amerithrax investigation, who in 2015 publicly claimed that they had no feasible case against [[Bruce Ivins]] and that evidence exonerating him had been deliberately concealed. | |description=The agent in charge of the FBI's Amerithrax investigation, who in 2015 publicly claimed that they had no feasible case against [[Bruce Ivins]] and that evidence exonerating him had been deliberately concealed. | ||
| + | |image=Richard Lambert.jpg | ||
|interests=2001 anthrax attacks/Cover up | |interests=2001 anthrax attacks/Cover up | ||
|historycommons=http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=richard_lambert_1 | |historycommons=http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=richard_lambert_1 | ||
| Line 14: | Line 15: | ||
==Blowing the whistle== | ==Blowing the whistle== | ||
| − | [[image:lambert_lawsuit_coverpage.jpg|left| | + | [[image:lambert_lawsuit_coverpage.jpg|left|450px|thumbnail|The front page of Lambert's lawsuit]] |
On April 2nd, 2015, Richard L. Lambert initiated a lawsuit against [[US Attorney General]] [[Eric Holder]], former [[FBI Director]] [[Robert Mueller]], the [[US Justice Department]], the [[FBI]], FBI employee [[Patrick Kelley]] and unknown Justice Department and FBI employees for legal malpractice and violations of the Federal Tort Claims Act and Privacy Act. "This case was hailed at the time as the most important case in the history of the F.B.I.,” Mr. Lambert said. “But it was difficult for me to get experienced investigators assigned to it."<ref name=nytapril9>http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/09/us/ex-fbi-agent-claims-retaliation-for-dissent-in-anthrax-inquiry.html</ref> | On April 2nd, 2015, Richard L. Lambert initiated a lawsuit against [[US Attorney General]] [[Eric Holder]], former [[FBI Director]] [[Robert Mueller]], the [[US Justice Department]], the [[FBI]], FBI employee [[Patrick Kelley]] and unknown Justice Department and FBI employees for legal malpractice and violations of the Federal Tort Claims Act and Privacy Act. "This case was hailed at the time as the most important case in the history of the F.B.I.,” Mr. Lambert said. “But it was difficult for me to get experienced investigators assigned to it."<ref name=nytapril9>http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/09/us/ex-fbi-agent-claims-retaliation-for-dissent-in-anthrax-inquiry.html</ref> | ||
{{YouTubeVideo | {{YouTubeVideo | ||
Revision as of 01:01, 12 February 2018
 Richard Lambert     (whistleblower) | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Interests | 2001 anthrax attacks/Cover up |
The agent in charge of the FBI's Amerithrax investigation, who in 2015 publicly claimed that they had no feasible case against Bruce Ivins and that evidence exonerating him had been deliberately concealed. | |
Not to be confused with Richard Lambert (editor).
Richard Lambert is an FBI whistleblower.
Concerns
In 2006, Richard Lambert outlined problems in a formal complaint in 2006 to the Deputy Director of the FBI, John S. Pistole.[1] Meeting official disinterest from the establishment, in 2015 he filed a whistleblower lawsuit,[2] in the words of 911Blogger, "calling the entire FBI investigation bullsh!t".[3]
Blowing the whistle
On April 2nd, 2015, Richard L. Lambert initiated a lawsuit against US Attorney General Eric Holder, former FBI Director Robert Mueller, the US Justice Department, the FBI, FBI employee Patrick Kelley and unknown Justice Department and FBI employees for legal malpractice and violations of the Federal Tort Claims Act and Privacy Act. "This case was hailed at the time as the most important case in the history of the F.B.I.,” Mr. Lambert said. “But it was difficult for me to get experienced investigators assigned to it."[1]
While leading the investigation for the next four years, Plaintiff’s efforts to advance the case met with intransigence from WFO’s executive management, apathy and error from the FBI Laboratory, politically motivated communication embargos from FBI Headquarters, and yet another preceding and equally erroneous legal opinion from Defendant Kelley – all of which greatly obstructed and impeded the investigation.
From the lawsuit filed by Richard L. Lambert in 2015[4]
References
- ↑ a b http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/09/us/ex-fbi-agent-claims-retaliation-for-dissent-in-anthrax-inquiry.html
- ↑ https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/09/us/ex-fbi-agent-claims-retaliation-for-dissent-in-anthrax-inquiry.html
- ↑ http://911blogger.com/news/2015-04-17/head-fbi-s-anthrax-investigation-says-whole-thing-was-sham
- ↑ https://s3.amazonaws.com/s3.documentcloud.org/documents/1714250/former-fbi-special-agent-in-charge-richard.pdf
