Difference between revisions of "Shyam Sunder"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|WP= | |WP= | ||
|image=Shyam Sunder.jpg | |image=Shyam Sunder.jpg | ||
| − | |constitutes=academic | + | |constitutes=academic, deep state functionary |
|interests=Conspiracy Theorists, WTC7 | |interests=Conspiracy Theorists, WTC7 | ||
|historycommons=http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=shyam_sunder | |historycommons=http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=shyam_sunder | ||
| − | |description=Lead | + | |description="Lead investigator" into the [[destruction of WTC7]]. |
}} | }} | ||
| + | '''Dr. S. Shyam Sunder''' was "lead investigator" of the NIST report into the destruction of the [[World trade Center]].<ref> | ||
| + | https://canada.constructconnect.com/dcn/news/government/2017/11/911-destruction-controlled-demolition-fact-fiction</ref> | ||
| + | |||
==Official narrative== | ==Official narrative== | ||
Dr Sunder reported that the investigation into WTC7 was moving as fast as possible, stating "It's a very complex problem. It requires a level of fidelity in the modelling and rigour in the analysis that has never been done before."<ref>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7485331.stm</ref> | Dr Sunder reported that the investigation into WTC7 was moving as fast as possible, stating "It's a very complex problem. It requires a level of fidelity in the modelling and rigour in the analysis that has never been done before."<ref>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7485331.stm</ref> | ||
Revision as of 13:42, 31 March 2019
 Shyam Sunder  (academic, deep state functionary) | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Interests | • Conspiracy Theorists • WTC7 |
"Lead investigator" into the destruction of WTC7. | |
Dr. S. Shyam Sunder was "lead investigator" of the NIST report into the destruction of the World trade Center.[1]
Official narrative
Dr Sunder reported that the investigation into WTC7 was moving as fast as possible, stating "It's a very complex problem. It requires a level of fidelity in the modelling and rigour in the analysis that has never been done before."[2]
Related Document
| Title | Type | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| File:Letter to Shyam Sunder.pdf | letter | 20 July 2009 | Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth | A challenge to NIST on 16 specific points and on behalf of its 4,600 professional signatories, proposes a meeting to explore them. A proposal which will likely never be taken up. |
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.
