Difference between revisions of "Talk:Air disaster"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(move suggestion) |
m (Robin moved page Talk:Air crash to Talk:Air disaster: more accurate) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{talk}} | ||
==Move?== | ==Move?== | ||
'''Air crash''' is definite about what happened, which is not a good label to use, since it is often not cut and dried. [[Wikipedia]], often a good source of reference, has "Aviation accidents and incidents" - which is too long for my taste. How about "[[Air disaster]]" (sticking to singular as per [[Wikispooks:Standardisation#Singular.2FPlural|policy]])? -- [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 17:08, 18 August 2016 (IST) | '''Air crash''' is definite about what happened, which is not a good label to use, since it is often not cut and dried. [[Wikipedia]], often a good source of reference, has "Aviation accidents and incidents" - which is too long for my taste. How about "[[Air disaster]]" (sticking to singular as per [[Wikispooks:Standardisation#Singular.2FPlural|policy]])? -- [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 17:08, 18 August 2016 (IST) | ||
Latest revision as of 05:19, 26 August 2016
Move?
Air crash is definite about what happened, which is not a good label to use, since it is often not cut and dried. Wikipedia, often a good source of reference, has "Aviation accidents and incidents" - which is too long for my taste. How about "Air disaster" (sticking to singular as per policy)? -- Robin (talk) 17:08, 18 August 2016 (IST)
