Difference between revisions of "Dahiya doctrine"
(Version before the Zionists attacked "Dahiya Doctrine") |
m (Robin moved page Dahiya Doctrine to Dahiya doctrine over redirect) |
||
(14 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | ==History of the article "Dahiya Doctrine"== | + | {{concept |
− | An article gutted by the Zionists at Wikipedia. | + | |wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dahiya_doctrine |
− | + | }} | |
− | + | ==History of the Wikipedia article "Dahiya Doctrine"== | |
+ | An article gutted by the Zionists at Wikipedia. Started 10th March 2009, worked on by several people until 30 December of the same year, the stated policy of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dahiya_doctrine&oldid=334915913 deliberately attacking civilians] miraculously became "''a concept ... in which a conventional army targets civilian infrastructure used by terrorists''".<ref name=katz>[http://new.jpost.com/Israel/Article.aspx?id=166546 The Dahiya Doctrine vs. the Goldstone Report], Jerusalem Post 25th Jan 2010. Note - this is the primary reference in the new Zionist-friendly version of the article, quite unsuitable for a neutral article.</ref> The new WP version of "Dahiya Doctrine" is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dahiya_doctrine here], worth checking as it's full of links to other very, very biased WP articles. | ||
− | + | ==Original version of "Dahiya Doctrine" before the Zionists attacked it== | |
+ | '''Dahiya doctrine''' is a proposed and approved defense strategy of Israel under which "''Israel finally realizes that Arabs should be accountable for their leaders' acts''"<ref name=FinallyRealizes>[http://www.ynet.co.il/english/articles/0,7340,L-3605863,00.html "''Israel finally realizes that Arabs should be accountable for their leaders’ acts''"] The Dahiya strategy, according to IDF Northern Command Chief Gadi Eisenkot. Interview in Yedioth Ahronoth. 10.06.08.</ref> It is named after a Hizbullah stronghold in Beirut that Israel flattened from the air in the 34-day 2006 Lebanon War. | ||
− | Gaza was also mentioned in this connection, "too bad" this strategy "did not take hold immediately after the “disengagement” from Gaza and the first rocket barrages directed at the northern Negev ... | + | IDF Northern Command Chief Gadi Eisenkot expressed the doctrine's premise as follows: "''What happened in the Dahiya quarter of Beirut in 2006 will happen in every village from which Israel is fired on. [...] We will apply disproportionate force on it and cause great damage and destruction there. From our standpoint, these are not civilian villages, they are military bases. [...] This is not a recommendation. This is a plan. And it has been approved"''.<ref>[http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-files/Guardian/documents/2009/09/15/UNFFMGCReport.pdf Report of the United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict]. The Guardian. September 15, 2009.</ref> There would be no mercy shown "''when it comes to hitting the national infrastructure of a state that, in practice, is controlled by Hizbullah... In practical terms, the Palestinians in Gaza are all Khaled Mashaal, the Lebanese are all Nasrallah, and the Iranians are all Ahmadinejad.''"<ref name=EisenkotInterview>[http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3605863,00.html ''"From our standpoint, these are not civilian villages, they are military bases"''] Israel warns Hizbullah war would invite destruction, Maj.-Gen. Eisenkot tells Yedioth Ahronoth. 10.03.08</ref> |
+ | |||
+ | Gaza was also mentioned in this connection, "too bad" this strategy "''did not take hold immediately after the “disengagement” from Gaza and the first rocket barrages directed at the northern Negev ... implementing the Dahiya strategy in Gaza would have made it clear to Hamas that we do not intend to hit them proportionally ... Arab civilians grumble about being punished because of their leaders, while fearing their leaders more than they fear us. We need to make the fear we sow among them greater''". <ref name=EisenkotInterview /> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Some sources, although characterized as "pro-Israel" warned against this policy, especially in the run-up to the 2008–2009 Israel–Gaza conflict, claiming it would be disastrous, because the 2006 destruction of Dahiya had only made Hizbollah stronger.<ref>[http://www.zionism-israel.com/log/archives/00000626.html The Dahiya Strategy and Gaza: Unlessons of the Second Lebanon War] "''will not stop the rocket attacks and it will help the enemy achieve its goals''" www.zionism-israel.com 17.11. 2008</ref> In January 2009 after the ceasefire, the pro-Palestinian Electronic Intifada announced that "''Israel's Dahiya Doctrine comes to Gaza''".<ref>[http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article10224.shtml Israel's Dahiya Doctrine comes to Gaza] Electronic Intifada, 20 January 2009</ref> where, after the "bank of Hamas targets" ran out in the first few days of fighting the bombardment continued against mosques, universities, government buildings, the courts, 25 schools, and several hospitals along with bridges, roads, 10 electricity generating stations, sewage lines, and 1,500 factories, workshops and shops. | ||
− | |||
==Precedents== | ==Precedents== | ||
− | Elements of this policy have been seen before, perhaps most famously from General Moshe Dayan, "Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother" quoted by Martin | + | Elements of this policy have been seen before, perhaps most famously from General Moshe Dayan, "''Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother''" quoted by [[Martin van Creveld]], a professor at Israel’s Hebrew University in Sept 2003 who continued in his own words: "''We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen, before Israel goes under.''"<ref>"''We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen, before Israel goes under''", [[Martin van Creveld]], quoted at [http://observer.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,6903,1046411,00.html The Observer Guardian, The War Game] 21 September 2003; the original interview appeared in the Dutch weekly magazine: ''Elsevier'', 2002, no. 17, p. 52-53 (April 27th, 2002).</ref> The BBC quotes Israeli commentators as saying that Israel has "''a new military doctrine: 'go nuts' once and your enemies will fear to strike again''".<ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7940624.stm ''"'go nuts' once and your enemies will fear to strike again"''] BBC 13 March 2009.</ref> with Ofer Shelah saying "''In the face of enemies who have opted for a strategy of attrition and attacking from a distance, Israel will present itself as a 'crazy country', the kind that will respond (albeit after a great deal of time) in a massive and unfettered assault, with no proportion to the amount of casualties it has endured.''" |
+ | |||
+ | ==US Diplomatic Cables== | ||
+ | The following is from Wikileaks ''"Public Library of US Diplomacy"''. It is classified ''"SECRET"'' and Originates from the US Embassy in Tel Aviv. ''"Eisenkot"'' refers to IDF Major General Gadi Eisenkot, then OC of the Israeli Northern Command : | ||
+ | {{QB|<poem>{{T|6. (S) Eisenkot labeled any Israeli response to resumed conflict the "Dahiya doctrine" in reference to the leveled Dahiya quarter in Beirut during the Second Lebanon War in 2006. He said Israel will use disproportionate force upon any village that fires upon Israel, "causing great damage and destruction." Eisenkot made very clear: this is not a recommendation, but an already approved plan — from the Israeli perspective, these are "not civilian villages, they are military bases." Eisenkot in this statement echoed earlier private statements made by IDF Chief of General Staff Gabi Ashkenazi, who said the next fight in Southern Lebanon would come at a much higher cost for both sides — and that the IDF would not hold back. | ||
+ | 7. (SBU) Eisenkot stated that Damascus fully understands what the Israelis did in Dahiya, and that the Israelis have the capability of doing the same to Syria. He suggested the possibility of harm to the population has been Hizballah leader Nasrallah's main constraint, and the reason for the quiet over the past two years. Eisenkot criticized media coverage of Nasrallah, arguing it legitimizes and equalizes Nasrallah as an adversary.}} <ref>[https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/08TELAVIV2329_a.html#efmBOyBhT Public Library of US Diplomacy], Cable 08TELAVIV2329_a dated 15 October 2008 - Wikileaks </ref></poem> | ||
+ | }} | ||
+ | {{SMWDocs}} | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
+ | [[Category:Zionism]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Wikipedia]] |
Latest revision as of 01:42, 14 February 2018
Dahiya doctrine | |
---|---|
Interest of | Gadi Eiskenot |
Contents
History of the Wikipedia article "Dahiya Doctrine"
An article gutted by the Zionists at Wikipedia. Started 10th March 2009, worked on by several people until 30 December of the same year, the stated policy of deliberately attacking civilians miraculously became "a concept ... in which a conventional army targets civilian infrastructure used by terrorists".[1] The new WP version of "Dahiya Doctrine" is here, worth checking as it's full of links to other very, very biased WP articles.
Original version of "Dahiya Doctrine" before the Zionists attacked it
Dahiya doctrine is a proposed and approved defense strategy of Israel under which "Israel finally realizes that Arabs should be accountable for their leaders' acts"[2] It is named after a Hizbullah stronghold in Beirut that Israel flattened from the air in the 34-day 2006 Lebanon War.
IDF Northern Command Chief Gadi Eisenkot expressed the doctrine's premise as follows: "What happened in the Dahiya quarter of Beirut in 2006 will happen in every village from which Israel is fired on. [...] We will apply disproportionate force on it and cause great damage and destruction there. From our standpoint, these are not civilian villages, they are military bases. [...] This is not a recommendation. This is a plan. And it has been approved".[3] There would be no mercy shown "when it comes to hitting the national infrastructure of a state that, in practice, is controlled by Hizbullah... In practical terms, the Palestinians in Gaza are all Khaled Mashaal, the Lebanese are all Nasrallah, and the Iranians are all Ahmadinejad."[4]
Gaza was also mentioned in this connection, "too bad" this strategy "did not take hold immediately after the “disengagement” from Gaza and the first rocket barrages directed at the northern Negev ... implementing the Dahiya strategy in Gaza would have made it clear to Hamas that we do not intend to hit them proportionally ... Arab civilians grumble about being punished because of their leaders, while fearing their leaders more than they fear us. We need to make the fear we sow among them greater". [4]
Some sources, although characterized as "pro-Israel" warned against this policy, especially in the run-up to the 2008–2009 Israel–Gaza conflict, claiming it would be disastrous, because the 2006 destruction of Dahiya had only made Hizbollah stronger.[5] In January 2009 after the ceasefire, the pro-Palestinian Electronic Intifada announced that "Israel's Dahiya Doctrine comes to Gaza".[6] where, after the "bank of Hamas targets" ran out in the first few days of fighting the bombardment continued against mosques, universities, government buildings, the courts, 25 schools, and several hospitals along with bridges, roads, 10 electricity generating stations, sewage lines, and 1,500 factories, workshops and shops.
Precedents
Elements of this policy have been seen before, perhaps most famously from General Moshe Dayan, "Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother" quoted by Martin van Creveld, a professor at Israel’s Hebrew University in Sept 2003 who continued in his own words: "We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen, before Israel goes under."[7] The BBC quotes Israeli commentators as saying that Israel has "a new military doctrine: 'go nuts' once and your enemies will fear to strike again".[8] with Ofer Shelah saying "In the face of enemies who have opted for a strategy of attrition and attacking from a distance, Israel will present itself as a 'crazy country', the kind that will respond (albeit after a great deal of time) in a massive and unfettered assault, with no proportion to the amount of casualties it has endured."
US Diplomatic Cables
The following is from Wikileaks "Public Library of US Diplomacy". It is classified "SECRET" and Originates from the US Embassy in Tel Aviv. "Eisenkot" refers to IDF Major General Gadi Eisenkot, then OC of the Israeli Northern Command :
6. (S) Eisenkot labeled any Israeli response to resumed conflict the "Dahiya doctrine" in reference to the leveled Dahiya quarter in Beirut during the Second Lebanon War in 2006. He said Israel will use disproportionate force upon any village that fires upon Israel, "causing great damage and destruction." Eisenkot made very clear: this is not a recommendation, but an already approved plan — from the Israeli perspective, these are "not civilian villages, they are military bases." Eisenkot in this statement echoed earlier private statements made by IDF Chief of General Staff Gabi Ashkenazi, who said the next fight in Southern Lebanon would come at a much higher cost for both sides — and that the IDF would not hold back.
7. (SBU) Eisenkot stated that Damascus fully understands what the Israelis did in Dahiya, and that the Israelis have the capability of doing the same to Syria. He suggested the possibility of harm to the population has been Hizballah leader Nasrallah's main constraint, and the reason for the quiet over the past two years. Eisenkot criticized media coverage of Nasrallah, arguing it legitimizes and equalizes Nasrallah as an adversary. [9]
Related Document
Title | Type | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
Document:Goldstone: An act of negligence | Article | 4 April 2011 | Noura Erakat | Downplay of Israeli aggression towards civilians during the Gaza War, causes scholars to question Richard Goldstone. Regardless of what may have been his best intentions, Goldstone has negligently, one hopes not deliberately, undermined the laws of armed conflict and emboldened those states, like Israel, who believe that it is a surmountable nuisance. |
References
- ↑ The Dahiya Doctrine vs. the Goldstone Report, Jerusalem Post 25th Jan 2010. Note - this is the primary reference in the new Zionist-friendly version of the article, quite unsuitable for a neutral article.
- ↑ "Israel finally realizes that Arabs should be accountable for their leaders’ acts" The Dahiya strategy, according to IDF Northern Command Chief Gadi Eisenkot. Interview in Yedioth Ahronoth. 10.06.08.
- ↑ Report of the United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict. The Guardian. September 15, 2009.
- ↑ a b "From our standpoint, these are not civilian villages, they are military bases" Israel warns Hizbullah war would invite destruction, Maj.-Gen. Eisenkot tells Yedioth Ahronoth. 10.03.08
- ↑ The Dahiya Strategy and Gaza: Unlessons of the Second Lebanon War "will not stop the rocket attacks and it will help the enemy achieve its goals" www.zionism-israel.com 17.11. 2008
- ↑ Israel's Dahiya Doctrine comes to Gaza Electronic Intifada, 20 January 2009
- ↑ "We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen, before Israel goes under", Martin van Creveld, quoted at The Observer Guardian, The War Game 21 September 2003; the original interview appeared in the Dutch weekly magazine: Elsevier, 2002, no. 17, p. 52-53 (April 27th, 2002).
- ↑ "'go nuts' once and your enemies will fear to strike again" BBC 13 March 2009.
- ↑ Public Library of US Diplomacy, Cable 08TELAVIV2329_a dated 15 October 2008 - Wikileaks