Difference between revisions of "Anglo-US-NATO"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(create page) |
m (remove stub) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|geo-political | |geo-political | ||
|start=1990 | |start=1990 | ||
| + | |wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_community | ||
| + | |image=International_community.jpg | ||
}} | }} | ||
| + | '''The order of the constituent parts of the acronym''' are an approximate reflection of the historical seniority of its constituent elites as follows: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * ''"Anglo"'' denotes the elites of the ''Anglosphere'' which loosely comprises those of the so called [[Five eyes]] countries of the [[UKUSA]] agreement - USA, UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. It represents a secret intelligence conglomerate and thus underpins both the military and financial power of the elites. | ||
| + | * ''"US"'' denotes the elites of the USA. Its inclusion in all 3 parts of the acronym is appropriate in that it is THE dominant country in terms of ''nationally'' defined financial and military power. | ||
| + | *NATO denotes the elites of the countries of the NATO alliance and its partner and vassal states. | ||
| + | |||
| + | =="International community"== | ||
| + | The phrase is commonly used to imply unanimous international support for a point of view on a disputed issue. [[Noam Chomsky]] has noted the use of the term to refer to the [[United States]] and its [[client state]]s and allies in the media of those states.<ref>http://www.chomsky.info/articles/200209--.htm</ref><ref>http://www.thenewstribe.com/2012/06/14/israel-us-violators-of-international-law-says-noam-chomsky/</ref><ref>http://www.satellitemagazine.ca/2012/06/noam-chomsky-on-iran/</ref> The scholar and academic [[Martin Jacques]] says: "We all know what is meant by the term 'international community', don't we? It's the west, of course, nothing more, nothing less. Using the term 'international community' is a way of dignifying the west, of globalising it, of making it sound more respectable, more neutral and high-faluting."<ref>http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2006/aug/24/whatthehellistheinternati</ref> | ||
{{SMWDocs}} | {{SMWDocs}} | ||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 21:07, 10 January 2021
 Anglo-US-NATO     | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Start | 1990 |
| An acronym that encapsulates the politico/cultural/ethnic make up of the elites behind the drive to a uni-polar, globalised world politics under the hegemonic control of these elites. Its anodyne, 'for public consumption' analogues are: 'International Community' and 'Community of Democracies' | |
The order of the constituent parts of the acronym are an approximate reflection of the historical seniority of its constituent elites as follows:
- "Anglo" denotes the elites of the Anglosphere which loosely comprises those of the so called Five eyes countries of the UKUSA agreement - USA, UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. It represents a secret intelligence conglomerate and thus underpins both the military and financial power of the elites.
- "US" denotes the elites of the USA. Its inclusion in all 3 parts of the acronym is appropriate in that it is THE dominant country in terms of nationally defined financial and military power.
- NATO denotes the elites of the countries of the NATO alliance and its partner and vassal states.
"International community"
The phrase is commonly used to imply unanimous international support for a point of view on a disputed issue. Noam Chomsky has noted the use of the term to refer to the United States and its client states and allies in the media of those states.[1][2][3] The scholar and academic Martin Jacques says: "We all know what is meant by the term 'international community', don't we? It's the west, of course, nothing more, nothing less. Using the term 'international community' is a way of dignifying the west, of globalising it, of making it sound more respectable, more neutral and high-faluting."[4]
Related Documents
| Title | Type | Publication date | Author(s) | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document:The New Round of Sanctions – The Pre-War Period | article | 13 September 2014 | El Murid | A perceptive and informed analysis of the developing Anglo-US-NATO cold-war on Russia in light of the latest round of sanctions which came into effect on 12 September 2014 |
| Document:The Purge is coming | exposition | 3 September 2014 | Evgeny Fedorov | Evgeny Fedorov expounds on the developing political situation in Russia following the February 2014 Ukraine coup and the ongoing civil war in Eastern Ukraine. Detail on the Russian 5th column and what lies ahead |
| Document:The tyranny of the political spectrum | article | 5 March 2017 | Peter | Details of an exchange in the comments section of an article on the World Socialist Web Site between the author and a regular WSWS commentator which was quickly removed by the site operators. It illustrates the blinkered censorious nature of activists committed to both 'Left' and 'Right' - in this case the 'Left'. |
| Document:Washington with ISIS - Moscow with Syria | Interview | 12 September 2015 | Michel Chossudovsky | Press TV interview with Prof Michael Chossudovsky that juxtaposes Russian and US relations with the Syrian State together with the realities (and legalities) behind their respective deeds and actions. |
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.
