Difference between revisions of "Independent Police Complaints Commission"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Added: historycommons.) |
m (tidy references,description) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|website=https://www.ipcc.gov.uk/ | |website=https://www.ipcc.gov.uk/ | ||
|start=April 2004 | |start=April 2004 | ||
| + | |constitutes=regulator | ||
| + | |so_called=1 | ||
| + | |facebook=https://www.facebook.com/IPCC-Independent-Police-Complaints-Commission-105248346269780/ | ||
|logo=Independent Police Complaints Commission (logo).svg | |logo=Independent Police Complaints Commission (logo).svg | ||
|end=8 January 2018 | |end=8 January 2018 | ||
| Line 7: | Line 10: | ||
|ON_aim=Complaints about the English and Welsh police forces | |ON_aim=Complaints about the English and Welsh police forces | ||
|abbreviation=IPCC | |abbreviation=IPCC | ||
| + | |leaders=Independent Police Complaints Commission/Chairman | ||
|successors=Independent Office for Police Conduct | |successors=Independent Office for Police Conduct | ||
|historycommons=http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=independent_police_complaints_commission_1 | |historycommons=http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=independent_police_complaints_commission_1 | ||
| + | |description=A group interested in complaints about the [[UK police]] | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | The '''Independent Police Complaints Commission''' was a group interested in complaints about the UK police. It was succeeded | + | The '''"Independent Police Complaints Commission"''' was a group interested in complaints about the [[UK police]]. It was succeeded on 8 January 2018 by the [[Independent Office for Police Conduct]]. |
| + | |||
| + | ==VIPaedophile inaction== | ||
| + | {{FA|VIPaedophile}} | ||
| + | In 2015 the IPCC announced it was investigating 14 referrals of alleged corruption in the Metropolitan Police relating to child sex offences from the 1970s to the 2000s.<ref>https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/564473/Cyril-Smith-child-sex-abuse-Metropolitan-Police-undercover-investigation-scrapped</ref> | ||
| + | |||
==Killing of Jean Charles de Menezes== | ==Killing of Jean Charles de Menezes== | ||
| − | [[Lana Vandenberghe]] was dismissed after leaking documents to ITN because she was unhappy with the story told by {{ccm}} about the manner of [[Jean Charles de Menezes]]' demise. At the inquest into his death, [[Steve Reynolds]] from the IPCC "said no [<nowiki/>[[CCTV]]<nowiki/>] footage was recorded for a variety of reasons". On the bus, excessive vibrations meant that cameras were not working. At Stockwell Tube station, a workman had stepped on a cable, preventing recording of any the cameras on platform two. He reported that no footage was available from the underground train in de Menezes he was killed because the recording unit had been removed as part of the inquiry into the [[July 7 attacks]].<ref>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/3072960/Jean-Charles-de-Menezes-CCTV-footage-shown-at-inquest.html</ref> This pattern of missing [[CCTV]] footage is not an exceptional one. | + | [[Lana Vandenberghe]] was dismissed after leaking documents to ITN because she was unhappy with the story told by {{ccm}} about the manner of [[Jean Charles de Menezes]]' demise. At the inquest into his death, [[Steve Reynolds]] from the IPCC "said no [<nowiki/>[[CCTV]]<nowiki/>] footage was recorded for a variety of reasons". On the bus, excessive vibrations meant that cameras were not working. At Stockwell Tube station, a workman had stepped on a cable, preventing recording of any the cameras on platform two. He reported that no footage was available from the underground train in de Menezes he was killed because the recording unit had been removed as part of the inquiry into the [[July 7 attacks]].<ref>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/3072960/Jean-Charles-de-Menezes-CCTV-footage-shown-at-inquest.html</ref> This pattern of missing [[CCTV]] footage is not an exceptional one.<ref>[[CCTV#'Unavailable' CCTV footage]]</ref> |
==Police Action Lawyers Group resignations== | ==Police Action Lawyers Group resignations== | ||
| − | In February 2008 over a hundred lawyers who specialise in handling police complaints resigned from its advisory body, citing various criticisms of the IPCC including a pattern of favouritism towards the police, indifference and rudeness towards complainants, and complaints being rejected in spite of apparently powerful evidence in their support.<ref> | + | In February 2008 over a hundred [[lawyers]] who specialise in handling police complaints resigned from its advisory body, citing various criticisms of the IPCC including a pattern of favouritism towards the police, indifference and rudeness towards complainants, and complaints being rejected in spite of apparently powerful evidence in their support.<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2008/feb/25/police.law1</ref> |
{{SMWDocs}} | {{SMWDocs}} | ||
| + | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
Latest revision as of 02:17, 8 August 2021
 "Independent Police Complaints Commission"  (Regulator)     | |
|---|---|
.svg) | |
| Abbreviation | IPCC |
| Successor | Independent Office for Police Conduct |
| Formation | April 2004 |
| Extinction | 8 January 2018 |
| Parent organization | UK/Home Office |
| Leader | Independent Police Complaints Commission/Chairman |
| Subpage | •Independent Police Complaints Commission/Chairman |
| A group interested in complaints about the UK police | |
The "Independent Police Complaints Commission" was a group interested in complaints about the UK police. It was succeeded on 8 January 2018 by the Independent Office for Police Conduct.
Contents
VIPaedophile inaction
- Full article:
VIPaedophile
- Full article:
In 2015 the IPCC announced it was investigating 14 referrals of alleged corruption in the Metropolitan Police relating to child sex offences from the 1970s to the 2000s.[1]
Killing of Jean Charles de Menezes
Lana Vandenberghe was dismissed after leaking documents to ITN because she was unhappy with the story told by commercially-controlled media about the manner of Jean Charles de Menezes' demise. At the inquest into his death, Steve Reynolds from the IPCC "said no [CCTV] footage was recorded for a variety of reasons". On the bus, excessive vibrations meant that cameras were not working. At Stockwell Tube station, a workman had stepped on a cable, preventing recording of any the cameras on platform two. He reported that no footage was available from the underground train in de Menezes he was killed because the recording unit had been removed as part of the inquiry into the July 7 attacks.[2] This pattern of missing CCTV footage is not an exceptional one.[3]
Police Action Lawyers Group resignations
In February 2008 over a hundred lawyers who specialise in handling police complaints resigned from its advisory body, citing various criticisms of the IPCC including a pattern of favouritism towards the police, indifference and rudeness towards complainants, and complaints being rejected in spite of apparently powerful evidence in their support.[4]
A document sourced from Independent Police Complaints Commission
| Title | Type | Subject(s) | Publication date | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| File:02 08 07 ipcc stockwell.pdf | report | Jean Charles de Menezes | July 2007 | Stockwell two, the second report into the handling and dissemination of information by the Metropolitan Police Service to the Press, following the killing of Jean Charles de Menezes. |
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.
References
- ↑ https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/564473/Cyril-Smith-child-sex-abuse-Metropolitan-Police-undercover-investigation-scrapped
- ↑ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/3072960/Jean-Charles-de-Menezes-CCTV-footage-shown-at-inquest.html
- ↑ CCTV#'Unavailable' CCTV footage
- ↑ https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2008/feb/25/police.law1
