Difference between revisions of "Wedtech scandal"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "{{event |wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wedtech_scandal |start=1986 |end=1986 |constitutes= }} The '''Wedtech scandal''' lead to the resignation of Ed Meese after...") |
(|constitutes=Scandal) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|start=1986 | |start=1986 | ||
|end=1986 | |end=1986 | ||
| − | |constitutes= | + | |constitutes=Scandal |
}} | }} | ||
The '''Wedtech scandal''' lead to the resignation of [[Ed Meese]] after it emerged that his close friend had worked as a lobbyist for the Wedtech. He claimed however that the report produced independent counsel [[James McKay]] "fully vindicates me." McKay stated that he had insufficient evidence to indict Meese on most key matters under scrutiny.<ref>http://articles.latimes.com/1988-07-05/news/mn-5430_1_meese-resigns</ref> | The '''Wedtech scandal''' lead to the resignation of [[Ed Meese]] after it emerged that his close friend had worked as a lobbyist for the Wedtech. He claimed however that the report produced independent counsel [[James McKay]] "fully vindicates me." McKay stated that he had insufficient evidence to indict Meese on most key matters under scrutiny.<ref>http://articles.latimes.com/1988-07-05/news/mn-5430_1_meese-resigns</ref> | ||
Latest revision as of 21:08, 13 September 2024
| Date | 1986 |
|---|
The Wedtech scandal lead to the resignation of Ed Meese after it emerged that his close friend had worked as a lobbyist for the Wedtech. He claimed however that the report produced independent counsel James McKay "fully vindicates me." McKay stated that he had insufficient evidence to indict Meese on most key matters under scrutiny.[1]
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.
