Difference between revisions of "NDAA 2012"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Text replacement - "|wikipedia=http://en.wikipedia.org" to "|wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org") |
(global research) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|image_width=380px | |image_width=380px | ||
}} | }} | ||
| + | [[Michel Chossudovsky]] has written that "New Year’s Eve December 31, 2011 signing of the NDAA will indelibly go down as a landmark in American history. [[Barack Obama]] will go down in history as “the president who killed Constitutional democracy” in the United States."<ref>http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-inauguration-of-police-state-usa-2012-obama-signs-the-national-defense-authorization-act/28441</ref> | ||
| + | |||
==Challenge by Chris Hedges et al.== | ==Challenge by Chris Hedges et al.== | ||
{{FA|Hedges v. Obama}} | {{FA|Hedges v. Obama}} | ||
Revision as of 11:23, 17 July 2016
 NDAA 2012    | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Type | law |
| Start | 2012 |
Michel Chossudovsky has written that "New Year’s Eve December 31, 2011 signing of the NDAA will indelibly go down as a landmark in American history. Barack Obama will go down in history as “the president who killed Constitutional democracy” in the United States."[1]
Challenge by Chris Hedges et al.
- Full article: Hedges v. Obama
- Full article: Hedges v. Obama
Chris Hedges challenged the contitutionality of this law, allowing indefinite detention without charge as it does. The legal process worked its way up to the US Supreme Court, who agreed that lacked until Hedges lacked legal standing to challenge it. i.e. Before it was applied to him personally, he had no right to challenge it - a kind of Catch 22 situation, since if it were applied to him, he could be held incommunicado unable to challenge it.
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.
