Difference between revisions of "Template:Event"
(explain more) |
(SMWDataList calls) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|{{t|end}} = when the event ended, or when it is scheduled to (if at all) ''([[Property:End]])'' | |{{t|end}} = when the event ended, or when it is scheduled to (if at all) ''([[Property:End]])'' | ||
|{{t|location}} = where the event happened ''([[Property:Has location]])'' | |{{t|location}} = where the event happened ''([[Property:Has location]])'' | ||
− | |{{t|{{BLUE| | + | |{{t|{{BLUE|cause}}}} = agent/cause/creator/precursor of the event ''([[Property:Has cause]])''?? |
− | |{{t|{{BLUE| | + | |{{t|{{BLUE|involved}}}} = person affected by or otherwise relevant to the event ''([[Property:Involved]])''?? |
− | |{{t|{{BLUE| | + | |{{t|{{BLUE|effect}}}} = other events directly caused by this event ''([[Property:Has effect]])'' |
+ | |{{t|{{BLUE|constitutes}}}}= suitable descriptions of this event (e.g. "censorship", "war propaganda") ([[Property:Constitutes]]) | ||
... | ... | ||
}} | }} | ||
How useful is it to have separate properties for separate ''namespaces''? The idea of a,b,c is to allow chains of cause and effect to be worked out. | How useful is it to have separate properties for separate ''namespaces''? The idea of a,b,c is to allow chains of cause and effect to be worked out. | ||
A is_immediate_cause_of B, B consitutes War, => A constitutes Casus_Belli and the like... | A is_immediate_cause_of B, B consitutes War, => A constitutes Casus_Belli and the like... | ||
− | </poem></noinclude><includeonly> | + | </poem></noinclude><includeonly> |
+ | {{SMWDataList|has cause|{{{cause|}}}|{{{cause2}}}{{{cause3}}}|{{{cause4}}}|{{{cause5}}}}} | ||
+ | {{SMWDataList|involved|{{{involved|}}}|{{{involved2}}}{{{involved3}}}|{{{involved4}}}|{{{involved5}}}}} | ||
+ | {{SMWDataList|has effect|{{{effect|}}}|{{{effect2}}}{{{effect3}}}|{{{effect4}}}|{{{effect5}}}}} | ||
+ | {{SMWDataList|constitutes|{{{constitutes|}}}|{{{constitutes2}}}{{{constitutes3}}}|{{{constitutes4}}}|{{{constitutes5}}}}} | ||
+ | {{#if: {{{start|}}}|[[Start::{{{start}}}]]}} | ||
+ | {{#if: {{{end|}}}|[[End::{{{end}}}]]}} | ||
+ | {{#if: {{{occurred|}}}|[[Occurred on::{{{occurred}}}]]}} | ||
+ | {{#if: {{{location|}}}|[[Has location::{{{location|}}}]]}} | ||
+ | {{{SMWData|description={{{description|}}}}} | ||
+ | }}}</includeonly> |
Revision as of 04:40, 26 December 2013
This template provides a standard format for event pages. It takes the following arguments:
{{Event
|description = a short summary description of the event (Property:Description)
|occurred = when an event occurred (for instantaneous events) (Property:Occurred on)
|start = when the event began, or when it is scheduled to begin (Property:Start)
|end = when the event ended, or when it is scheduled to (if at all) (Property:End)
|location = where the event happened (Property:Has location)
|cause = agent/cause/creator/precursor of the event (Property:Has cause)??
|involved = person affected by or otherwise relevant to the event (Property:Involved)??
|effect = other events directly caused by this event (Property:Has effect)
|constitutes= suitable descriptions of this event (e.g. "censorship", "war propaganda") (Property:Constitutes)
...
}}
How useful is it to have separate properties for separate namespaces? The idea of a,b,c is to allow chains of cause and effect to be worked out.
A is_immediate_cause_of B, B consitutes War, => A constitutes Casus_Belli and the like...