Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Deep state functionary"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Use corporate media terms to increase social media ranknings?) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:Makes sense, but in practice, quite difficult to tell the two apart. -- [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 12:04, 3 May 2022 (UTC) | :Makes sense, but in practice, quite difficult to tell the two apart. -- [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 12:04, 3 May 2022 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::Why not use Intelligence terms? Agent of Influence and Useful idiot are known terms in political and intelligence circles and used by corporate media & Hollywood. Although I prefer DSF, for the record. --[[User:Jun|Jun]] ([[User talk:Jun|talk]]) 20:38, 4 May 2022 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:38, 4 May 2022
Deep state tool?
Deep state tool redirects here. I wonder whether this might be worth separating from deep state functionary. If so, how would the meanings be separated?... -- Robin (talk) 15:18, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
I see only 5 people with deep state tool at the moment: Neil Ferguson,Daniel Andrews,Karl Lauterbach ,Mark McGowan (Australian politician),Jens Spahn . I suppose a tool is too stupid/ignorant to realize he/she is being used, while a functionary just follows orders. Terje (talk) 23:50, 2 May 2022 (UTC)---
