Difference between revisions of "Talk:COVID-19/Vaccine"
(question) |
(Gallup Poll) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/early/2021/02/16/science.abf4896.full.pdf -- [[User:Jun]] 17:47, 17 February 2021 (UTC) | https://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/early/2021/02/16/science.abf4896.full.pdf -- [[User:Jun]] 17:47, 17 February 2021 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | ==Gallup Polls== | |
Wanted to put in some parts from a [[Gallup]] poll, but then stopped looking at their numbers.<ref>http://archive.today/2021.02.21-005726/https://news.gallup.com/poll/328688/front-line-workers-no-keener-others-vaccine.aspx</ref> Is there an accounting system that would give you 101%, that I am not aware of ?? Thanks for any help. [https://www.theepochtimes.com/the-biggest-covid-19-vaccine-skeptics-frontline-health-care-workers_3724145.html Epoch Times report] -- [[User:Sunvalley|Sunvalley]] ([[User talk:Sunvalley|talk]]) 17:36, 15 March 2021 (UTC) | Wanted to put in some parts from a [[Gallup]] poll, but then stopped looking at their numbers.<ref>http://archive.today/2021.02.21-005726/https://news.gallup.com/poll/328688/front-line-workers-no-keener-others-vaccine.aspx</ref> Is there an accounting system that would give you 101%, that I am not aware of ?? Thanks for any help. [https://www.theepochtimes.com/the-biggest-covid-19-vaccine-skeptics-frontline-health-care-workers_3724145.html Epoch Times report] -- [[User:Sunvalley|Sunvalley]] ([[User talk:Sunvalley|talk]]) 17:36, 15 March 2021 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : That has to do with rounding. It's a '''normal''' occurrence taught in statistics (and a reason how CNN keeps getting away with those non-rounded polls) to round off numbers. They do not want to artificially adjust one number with 1% so that it rounds off at 100% because that would give sites like us a reason to say "oh, they adjusted it, it's not real, they're being paid, etc etc!". Long story short, feel safe to use it. --[[User:Jun|Jun]] ([[User talk:Jun|talk]]) 21:26, 15 March 2021 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:26, 15 March 2021
Contents
Some thoughts
By design -- as far es the ON is concerned -- a vaccine has the potential to make a strong immune system more resilient, but in contrast a weak immune system might suffer more likely from adverse reactions. Doesn't that sound like the common "the strong will survive"-refrain of social darwinism aka eugenics? The line has to be drawn somewhere and this line may be manipulated by choosing the right subjects for tests. A vaccine might be of little harm to a well fed middle class steak eater but not so for the rest of humanity. Urban (talk) 08:51, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
And upper middle class people in the West might anyway receive a different vaccine formula than people in Afghanistan, India etc... Terje (talk) 09:50, 25 May 2020 (UTC)---
Some information I found on Stem cell therapy used in vaccines
Not sure if these links are useful to anyone, I did a search of stem cell therapy being used in vaccines. I will be looking further into it. Sorry if this information is not useful.
.https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2020-moderna-biontech-covid-shot/ .https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/20200403/fda-oks-1st-stem-cell-human-trial-for-covid-19 .https://www.cdc.gov/flu/prevent/cell-based.htm .https://newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/stem-cell-research-covid-19 .https://www.sciencemediacentre.co.nz/2020/08/27/covid-19-vaccines-developed-with-human-embryonic-cells-expert-reaction/
Nasal-Spray
Good points above here; some more from the Erasmus University Rotterdam https://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/early/2021/02/16/science.abf4896.full.pdf -- User:Jun 17:47, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Gallup Polls
Wanted to put in some parts from a Gallup poll, but then stopped looking at their numbers.[1] Is there an accounting system that would give you 101%, that I am not aware of ?? Thanks for any help. Epoch Times report -- Sunvalley (talk) 17:36, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- That has to do with rounding. It's a normal occurrence taught in statistics (and a reason how CNN keeps getting away with those non-rounded polls) to round off numbers. They do not want to artificially adjust one number with 1% so that it rounds off at 100% because that would give sites like us a reason to say "oh, they adjusted it, it's not real, they're being paid, etc etc!". Long story short, feel safe to use it. --Jun (talk) 21:26, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
