Difference between revisions of "Document:WikiLeaks D Notice"
UpgradeBot (talk | contribs) |
(source URL) |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{Document |
| − | | | + | |publication_date=2010-11-26 |
| − | | | + | |type=D Notice |
| − | | | + | |subjects=Wikileaks |
| − | | | + | |constitutes=Censorship |
| − | | | + | |authors=Andrew Vallance |
| − | + | |recipients=Various | |
| − | | | + | |source_URL=https://shadowproof.com/2010/11/26/did-the-us-issue-a-prior-restraint-request-to-the-nyt-too/ |
}} | }} | ||
==WikiLeaks DA Notice 26 November 2010== | ==WikiLeaks DA Notice 26 November 2010== | ||
Latest revision as of 04:42, 26 October 2018
D Notice by Andrew Vallance to Various dated 2010-11-26Subjects: Wikileaks
Example of: Censorship
Source: Link
★ Start a Discussion about this document
WikiLeaks DA Notice 26 November 2010
From: Andrew Vallance
Sent: Fri 26/11/2010 12:42
To: Sunday Telegraph; Ian Martin; Sunday Telegraph; Channel Five; Caroline Wyatt; C4 News Desk; Sun; Kevin Brown; Sunday Mail; Mail on Sunday; Five TV; Associated Press TV; William Lewis; Tim Marshall; Press Gazette; Allister Heath; Jonathan Collett; Daily Telegraph; Daily Record; Evening Standard; Daily Star; Independent on Sunday; Observer; Foresight News; Daily Express; Sunday Times; Financial Times; Associated Press; Times; Spark FM; chris wissun; Sunday Mirror; Sunday Herald; News of the World; Tom Newton-Dunn; Stephen Abell; Scotsman; Press Association; BFBS Will Inglis; Will Gore; Mark Birdsall; Guardian; Daily Mail; Daily Mirror; People; Foresight News; Telegraph Legal; Glenmore Trenear-Harvey; Sunday Post; Reuters; ITV News Desk; Independent; Evening Times; Jonathan Grun; Glasgow Herald; Five TV
Subject: DA Notice Letter of Advice to All UK Editors – Further Wikileaks Disclosures
To All Editors
Impending Further National Security Disclosures by Wikileaks
I understand that Wikileaks will very shortly release a further mass of US official documents onto its internet website. The full scope of the subject matter covered by these documents remains to be seen, but it is possible that some of them may contain information that falls within the UK’s Defence Advisory Notice code. Given the large number of documents thought to be involved, it is unlikely that sensitive UK national security information within these documents would be recognised by a casual browser. However, aspects of national security might be put at risk if a major UK media news outlet brought such information into obvious public prominence through its general publication or broadcast.
Therefore, may I ask you to seek my advice before publishing or broadcasting any information drawn from these latest Wikileaks’ disclosures which might be covered by the five standing DA Notices. In particular, would you carefully consider information that might be judged to fall within the terms of DA Notice 1 (UK Military Operations, Plans and Capabilities) and DA Notice 5 (UK Intelligence Services and Special Forces). May I also ask you to bear in mind the potential consequential effects of disclosing information which would put at risk the safety and security of Britons working or living in volatile regions where such publicity might trigger violent local reactions, for example Iran, Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan? As always, I am available 24/7 to offer DA Notice guidance…
Yours Sincerely,
Andrew Vallance Air Vice-Marshal Secretary, Defence Press and Broadcasting Advisory Committee
