Difference between revisions of "Template talk:WPAdjunct"
(Notes on the new icons) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
[[User:Robin|Robin]] 16:44, 10 April 2012 (IST) | [[User:Robin|Robin]] 16:44, 10 April 2012 (IST) | ||
| + | :I like the finished effect, eg [http://www.wikispooks.com/wiki/USS_Liberty_Incident here]! [[User:Toolbox|Toolbox]] 09:49, 6 June 2012 (IST) | ||
== Icons == | == Icons == | ||
| − | I just added icons, which feels right to me, giving regular readers a quick fix on what the problem is. We might want to look | + | I just added icons, which feels right to me, giving regular readers a quick fix on what the problem is, like [[Wikipedia]] itself. We might want to look there for inspiration. Actually, I'm wondering about a Wikipedia+ upgrade/bespoke Wikispooks addon, to pop up a little warning like this at the top of Wikipedia pages. [[User:Robin|Robin]] 03:08, 8 June 2012 (IST) |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 02:08, 8 June 2012
The Idea Is...
To use this as a way to help standardise our assessment of/relationships to Wikipedia pages. A taxonomy of Wikipedia Problems would help. In the meantime, feel free to adjust this template e.g. by adding extra reasons, or modifying the reason text. I feel like leaving the option to use custom text is a good choice, but the aim is to categorise the problems. Maybe later add fancy icons etc. to help regular readers.
Robin 16:44, 10 April 2012 (IST)
Icons
I just added icons, which feels right to me, giving regular readers a quick fix on what the problem is, like Wikipedia itself. We might want to look there for inspiration. Actually, I'm wondering about a Wikipedia+ upgrade/bespoke Wikispooks addon, to pop up a little warning like this at the top of Wikipedia pages. Robin 03:08, 8 June 2012 (IST)
