Difference between revisions of "US/Supreme Court"
< US
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(leader) |
(constitutes) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|wikipedia=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States | |wikipedia=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States | ||
|type=legal | |type=legal | ||
+ | |constitutes=court | ||
|image = Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg | |image = Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg | ||
|image_width = 270px | |image_width = 270px | ||
Line 10: | Line 11: | ||
|coordinates = {{Coord|38|53|26|N|77|00|16|W|display=inline,title}}<!--This is in 1.8" (0.0005 deg) increments, appropriate for the scale of the building--> | |coordinates = {{Coord|38|53|26|N|77|00|16|W|display=inline,title}}<!--This is in 1.8" (0.0005 deg) increments, appropriate for the scale of the building--> | ||
|website = http://supremecourt.gov | |website = http://supremecourt.gov | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
}} | }} | ||
In June 2013 the US supreme court confirmed a federal appeals court ruling about [[Donald Rumsfeld]] by claiming that be cannot be held liable for any illegal actions of his subordinates. He was being sued for personally authorising "[[enhanced interrogation]]" techniques.<ref>www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/10/supreme-court-donald-rumsfeld_n_3415124.html</ref><ref>http://rt.com/usa/supreme-rumsfeld-vance-court-493/</ref> | In June 2013 the US supreme court confirmed a federal appeals court ruling about [[Donald Rumsfeld]] by claiming that be cannot be held liable for any illegal actions of his subordinates. He was being sued for personally authorising "[[enhanced interrogation]]" techniques.<ref>www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/10/supreme-court-donald-rumsfeld_n_3415124.html</ref><ref>http://rt.com/usa/supreme-rumsfeld-vance-court-493/</ref> |
Revision as of 16:42, 22 January 2015
US/Supreme Court (Court) | |
---|---|
Formation | 1789 |
Headquarters | Washington, D.C. |
Type | legal |
Interest of | Linda Greenhouse |
In June 2013 the US supreme court confirmed a federal appeals court ruling about Donald Rumsfeld by claiming that be cannot be held liable for any illegal actions of his subordinates. He was being sued for personally authorising "enhanced interrogation" techniques.[1][2]
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.
References
- ↑ www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/10/supreme-court-donald-rumsfeld_n_3415124.html
- ↑ http://rt.com/usa/supreme-rumsfeld-vance-court-493/