Difference between revisions of "US/Supreme Court"
< US
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(fix date) |
(tidy) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
|termstart = September 29, 2005 | |termstart = September 29, 2005 | ||
}} | }} | ||
− | |||
In June 2013 the US supreme court confirmed a federal appeals court ruling about [[Donald Rumsfeld]] by claiming that be cannot be held liable for any illegal actions of his subordinates. He was being sued for personally authorising "[[enhanced interrogation]]" techniques.<ref>www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/10/supreme-court-donald-rumsfeld_n_3415124.html</ref><ref>http://rt.com/usa/supreme-rumsfeld-vance-court-493/</ref> | In June 2013 the US supreme court confirmed a federal appeals court ruling about [[Donald Rumsfeld]] by claiming that be cannot be held liable for any illegal actions of his subordinates. He was being sued for personally authorising "[[enhanced interrogation]]" techniques.<ref>www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/10/supreme-court-donald-rumsfeld_n_3415124.html</ref><ref>http://rt.com/usa/supreme-rumsfeld-vance-court-493/</ref> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
{{SMWDocs}} | {{SMWDocs}} | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} |
Revision as of 17:50, 26 May 2014
US/Supreme Court | |
---|---|
Formation | 1789 |
Headquarters | Washington, D.C. |
Type | legal |
Interest of | Linda Greenhouse |
In June 2013 the US supreme court confirmed a federal appeals court ruling about Donald Rumsfeld by claiming that be cannot be held liable for any illegal actions of his subordinates. He was being sued for personally authorising "enhanced interrogation" techniques.[1][2]
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.
References
- ↑ www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/10/supreme-court-donald-rumsfeld_n_3415124.html
- ↑ http://rt.com/usa/supreme-rumsfeld-vance-court-493/