Difference between revisions of "US/Supreme Court"
< US
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(A custom SMWDocs section for this page) |
|||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
In June 2013 the US supreme court confirmed a federal appeals court ruling about [[Donald Rumsfeld]] by claiming that be cannot be held liable for any illegal actions of his subordinates. He was being sued for personally authorising "[[enhanced interrogation]]" techniques.<ref>www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/10/supreme-court-donald-rumsfeld_n_3415124.html</ref><ref>http://rt.com/usa/supreme-rumsfeld-vance-court-493/</ref> | In June 2013 the US supreme court confirmed a federal appeals court ruling about [[Donald Rumsfeld]] by claiming that be cannot be held liable for any illegal actions of his subordinates. He was being sued for personally authorising "[[enhanced interrogation]]" techniques.<ref>www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/10/supreme-court-donald-rumsfeld_n_3415124.html</ref><ref>http://rt.com/usa/supreme-rumsfeld-vance-court-493/</ref> | ||
{{SMWDocSection | {{SMWDocSection | ||
− | |expression= [[Has | + | |expression= [[Has eventType::legal case]][[Has authority::{{FULLPAGENAME}}]] |
|captionSingular= A Supreme Court Case of Note | |captionSingular= A Supreme Court Case of Note | ||
|captionPlural= Notable Supreme Court Cases | |captionPlural= Notable Supreme Court Cases |
Revision as of 17:38, 26 May 2014
US/Supreme Court | |
---|---|
Formation | 1789 |
Headquarters | Washington, D.C. |
Type | legal |
Interest of | Linda Greenhouse |
In June 2013 the US supreme court confirmed a federal appeals court ruling about Donald Rumsfeld by claiming that be cannot be held liable for any illegal actions of his subordinates. He was being sued for personally authorising "enhanced interrogation" techniques.[1][2]
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.
References
- ↑ www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/10/supreme-court-donald-rumsfeld_n_3415124.html
- ↑ http://rt.com/usa/supreme-rumsfeld-vance-court-493/