Difference between revisions of "Talk:Russia/Encirclement"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Data==
 
==Data==
 
According to our internal data this page is the most clicked link on the [[2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine]] page. Please try to add to this page. --[[User:Jun|Jun]] ([[User talk:Jun|talk]]) 15:16, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
 
According to our internal data this page is the most clicked link on the [[2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine]] page. Please try to add to this page. --[[User:Jun|Jun]] ([[User talk:Jun|talk]]) 15:16, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
:Thx Jun. I repeat that I think that Russia was cornered, its militar action was provoced and I think Putin was aware of this. He visits Davos and Munich conferences (not 2021? though). I expect that increased military spending has a stabilizing effect on the monetary system and stock markets in the long run - as sarcastic as it may sound. I expect a split of Ukraine where NATO intervienes and occupies the west with a tacit agreement between US and Russia not to use nuclear weapons. Bio weapons are an option - for the US (and their WHO). The UN full assembly might vote for US led "peace forces". The {{ccm}} will produce [[fearporn]] and dramatize the situation, although the actual war will be limited to pre-determined outcomes. Thats my take on it. I could provide sources and citations for these views. [[User:Urban|Urban]] ([[User talk:Urban|talk]]) 07:25, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
+
:Thx Jun. I repeat that I think that Russia was cornered, its militar action was provoced and I think Putin was aware of this. He visits Davos and Munich conferences (not 2021? though). I expect that increased military spending has a stabilizing effect on the monetary system and stock markets in the long run - as sarcastic as it may sound. I expect a split of Ukraine where NATO intervenes and occupies the west with a tacit agreement between US and Russia not to use nuclear weapons. Bio weapons are an option - for the US (and their WHO). The UN full assembly might vote for US led "peace forces". The {{ccm}} will produce [[fearporn]] and dramatize the situation, although the actual war will be limited to pre-determined outcomes. That's my take on it. I could provide sources and citations for these views. [[User:Urban|Urban]] ([[User talk:Urban|talk]]) 07:25, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
 +
::The timing makes me suspicious -- as we suggested in January 2022, it makes a very convenient change for a worn out [[Covid]] narrative. -- [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 15:42, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:42, 28 February 2022

Data

According to our internal data this page is the most clicked link on the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine page. Please try to add to this page. --Jun (talk) 15:16, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Thx Jun. I repeat that I think that Russia was cornered, its militar action was provoced and I think Putin was aware of this. He visits Davos and Munich conferences (not 2021? though). I expect that increased military spending has a stabilizing effect on the monetary system and stock markets in the long run - as sarcastic as it may sound. I expect a split of Ukraine where NATO intervenes and occupies the west with a tacit agreement between US and Russia not to use nuclear weapons. Bio weapons are an option - for the US (and their WHO). The UN full assembly might vote for US led "peace forces". The commercially-controlled media will produce fearporn and dramatize the situation, although the actual war will be limited to pre-determined outcomes. That's my take on it. I could provide sources and citations for these views. Urban (talk) 07:25, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
The timing makes me suspicious -- as we suggested in January 2022, it makes a very convenient change for a worn out Covid narrative. -- Robin (talk) 15:42, 28 February 2022 (UTC)