Difference between revisions of "File:NIST Analyses Brookman.pdf"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (white space)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''From [http://www.ae911truth.org/ Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth]'''
+
{{Document
 
+
|publication_date=26 March 2010
The NIST Analyses: A Close Look at WTC 7
+
|type=paper
By Ronald H. Brookman, SE. 26 March 2010
+
|description=
 
+
|authors=Ronald H. Brookman
 +
|authors_detail=SE
 +
|subjects=9-11/WTC Controlled demolition, 9-11/WTC7/Collapse, Nano-thermite, NIST
 +
|title=The NIST Analyses: A Close Look at WTC 7
 +
|note=Via [[Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth]]
 +
}}
 
===Preface===
 
===Preface===
 
The following comments and questions describe why I consider the Final Reports NCSTAR 1A, 1-9 and 1-9A to be incomplete, inconsistent and erroneous.
 
The following comments and questions describe why I consider the Final Reports NCSTAR 1A, 1-9 and 1-9A to be incomplete, inconsistent and erroneous.
Line 10: Line 15:
  
 
Public disclosure of one's convictions is always a risk, but silent acceptance is not an option. Permission is granted to reprint or quote excerpts freely and solely without charge.
 
Public disclosure of one's convictions is always a risk, but silent acceptance is not an option. Permission is granted to reprint or quote excerpts freely and solely without charge.
 
 
[[Category:9/11]]
 
[[Category:Building 7]]
 
[[Category:Doc]]
 

Latest revision as of 13:31, 3 January 2016

★ Start a Discussion about this document
The NIST Analyses: A Close Look at WTC 7



Preface

The following comments and questions describe why I consider the Final Reports NCSTAR 1A, 1-9 and 1-9A to be incomplete, inconsistent and erroneous.

Sincere thanks are due to Chris Sarns, Andrew Donlan, Gregg Roberts, David Chandler and Dwain Deets for their helpful comments. I hope many others will spend the time to evaluate the NCSTAR reports carefully, follow the references herein, and draw their own conclusion.

Public disclosure of one's convictions is always a risk, but silent acceptance is not an option. Permission is granted to reprint or quote excerpts freely and solely without charge.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeDimensionsUserComment
current16:50, 9 July 2010 (168 KB)Peter (talk | contribs)
  • You cannot overwrite this file.

There are no pages that use this file.