Stig Engström
 Stig Engström    (graphic designer, alleged assassin) | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Born | Stig Folke Wilhelm Engström 26 February 1934 |
| Died | 26 June 2000 (Age 66) |
| Supposed perpetrator of | Olof Palme/Assassination |
Stig Engström (26 February 1934 – 26 June 2000) was one of the people known to have been present at the scene of the assassination of Olof Palme, Prime Minister of Sweden, on 28 February 1986.
Initially treated by the police as an eyewitness, and at one point as a potential suspect, Stig Engström was later proposed as the assassin by Swedish writers Lars Larsson and, separately, Thomas Pettersson. In line with Swedish media reporting practices of not disclosing the names of suspects, Engström was dubbed the Skandia man, since he arrived at the crime scene from the nearby head office of the Skandia insurance company, where he was employed.
On 10 June 2020, at a digital press conference in Stockholm, Krister Petersson of the Swedish Prosecution Authority named Stig Engström as the suspected perpetrator and announced his decision to discontinue the investigation into the murder of Olof Palme:[1]
“As the person is deceased, I cannot bring charges against him and have decided to discontinue the investigation. In my opinion, Stig Engström is the prime suspect. My assessment is that, after over 34 years, it is difficult to believe that any further investigation would provide us with any new details and therefore I believe we have come as far as one could expect.
“This concerns, among other things, the descriptions provided of Stig Engström which correspond well with several witness statements. His own statement concerning his actions during the period of time the crime was committed does not reconcile with statements provided by others. The evidence strongly suggests he was at the crime scene, but in a completely different role than the one he wished to present. All in all, there are a number of circumstances that point to Engström.
"Had the current Palme investigation group been in charge 34 years ago, Stig Engström would have been remanded in custody had he been unable to provide satisfactory explanations for his movements and actions. My assessment is that there would have been sufficient evidence to have him detained in custody.”[2]
References
This page imported content from Wikipedia on 10 June 2020.Wikipedia is not affiliated with Wikispooks. Original page source here
