Difference between revisions of "Project Censored"

From Wikispooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(URL)
(logo)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{website
 
{{website
 
|wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Censored
 
|wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Censored
 +
|logo=ProjectCensored.png
 
|URL=http://www.ProjectCensored.org
 
|URL=http://www.ProjectCensored.org
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 07:50, 5 December 2015

ProjectCensored.png
Website.png http://www.ProjectCensored.org  Rdf-entity.pngRdf-icon.png



September 11th

On October 2, 2010, Infowars.net reported that since The Institute for Policy Studies took over Minuteman media, the subject of 9-11 has been blackballed:


“We’ve never had an op-ed piece that we were contracted to do rejected, outright rejected, and it wasn’t just rejected because of some contractual issue or violation,” [Mickey] Huff said. “We were actually told specifically from people at IPS that it was because we mentioned 9/11 as part of a piece on state crimes against democracy.”

“What we’re suggesting is that the events of September 11th have all the trappings of a potential state crime against democracy.” Huff continued. “So we mentioned the scientific studies done by Stephen Jones and the open chemical physics journal, and we included Richard Gage and the Architects and Engineers group, 1200 experts now saying that the official science just doesn’t make sense and just doesn’t add up, I mean it defies everything we know about scientific methodology and so forth.”

“They literally told us that they were not going to publish anything that talked about 9/11.”


Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.


57px-Notepad icon.png This is a page stub. Please add to it.