Difference between revisions of "Defense Information Systems Agency"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(stub) |
(Added: headquarters, predecessors, leader, num_staff.) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{group | {{group | ||
− | |||
|subgroups=White House Communications Agency | |subgroups=White House Communications Agency | ||
+ | |wikipedia=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_House_Communications_Agency | ||
+ | |headquarters=Naval Support Facility Anacostia, Washington, D.C | ||
+ | |predecessors=White House Signal Detachment, White House Army Signal Agency, Defense Communications Agency | ||
+ | |leader=USAF | ||
+ | |num_staff=501-1000 | ||
}} | }} | ||
Manages the [[Defense Information Systems Network]] | Manages the [[Defense Information Systems Network]] |
Revision as of 16:40, 28 July 2015
Defense Information Systems Agency | |
---|---|
Predecessor | • White House Signal Detachment • White House Army Signal Agency • Defense Communications Agency |
Parent organization | US/Department/Defense |
Headquarters | Naval Support Facility Anacostia, Washington, D.C |
Subgroups | White House Communications Agency |
Staff | 501-1,000 |
Manages the Defense Information Systems Network
Official narrative
"Information superiority in defense of our Nation [i.e. the USA]."
Problems
Can an insistence on 'superiority' equate to defence? Presumably in the same way the "war department" became the "defense department" and "aggressive" became a laudatory adjective.[1]
The Wikipedia article[2] has been described as not "a bit pro-DISA", it's a freakin' press release!="[3].
Many thanks to our Patrons who cover ~2/3 of our hosting bill. Please join them if you can.
References
- ↑ http://www.robinupton.com/research/publications/How%20%27Aggressive%27%20became%20the%20new%20%27Professional%27%20(Robin%20Upton).pdf
- ↑ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_Information_Systems_Network
- ↑ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Defense_Information_Systems_Agency&oldid=583251193