Difference between revisions of "Talk:David Kelly/Assassination"
(Notes on tidying this) |
m (reply) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
In line with the (newly minted) [[WikiSpooks:Templates]] policy, I zapped the single use KellyDocs template. There is still a rather messy pile of links left. I wonder whether they can all be fitted neatly into the existing SMWDocs framework, or whether the time has come to expand that a little... [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 06:58, 31 January 2014 (GMT) | In line with the (newly minted) [[WikiSpooks:Templates]] policy, I zapped the single use KellyDocs template. There is still a rather messy pile of links left. I wonder whether they can all be fitted neatly into the existing SMWDocs framework, or whether the time has come to expand that a little... [[User:Robin|Robin]] ([[User talk:Robin|talk]]) 06:58, 31 January 2014 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Your work-rate is impressive and I have no issues with any of the above. I have a lot of content-type material I want to get up and so prefer to spend less time on SMW-Development (except I will spend a bit of time on forms -event, person etc- since I spend so much time using the existing document one). I agree the SMW development IS essential though - and a serious positive descriminator from other aspiring outside-the-matrix sites. So, by all means, press on with it. All the usual cautions apply and I'll be quick to offer an an opinion on changes with possible harmful potential. --[[User:Peter|Peter P]] ([[User talk:Peter|talk]]) 07:42, 31 January 2014 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 07:42, 31 January 2014
Tidying This
I've just split this off from the David Kelly page. This is essential to a sane use of SMW, since one is a person, one an event. Like with 9-11, I think this could be a good test-bed to see how well the existing SMW framework can express the ad hoc (i.e. human-readable) page which has been built so far. I made it a sub-page - not essential but it seems like a sensible way to help structure things, possibly a good practice which we can reflect when creating new material.
In line with the (newly minted) WikiSpooks:Templates policy, I zapped the single use KellyDocs template. There is still a rather messy pile of links left. I wonder whether they can all be fitted neatly into the existing SMWDocs framework, or whether the time has come to expand that a little... Robin (talk) 06:58, 31 January 2014 (GMT)
- Your work-rate is impressive and I have no issues with any of the above. I have a lot of content-type material I want to get up and so prefer to spend less time on SMW-Development (except I will spend a bit of time on forms -event, person etc- since I spend so much time using the existing document one). I agree the SMW development IS essential though - and a serious positive descriminator from other aspiring outside-the-matrix sites. So, by all means, press on with it. All the usual cautions apply and I'll be quick to offer an an opinion on changes with possible harmful potential. --Peter P (talk) 07:42, 31 January 2014 (GMT)
