Difference between revisions of "Charles Horner"
(diplomat) |
m (Text replacement - " served as " to " was ") |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
|employment= | |employment= | ||
}} | }} | ||
− | '''Charles Horner''' is a senior fellow at the [[neoconservative]] [[Hudson Institute]], where he specializes in [[China]], international science and technology relations, and [[international treaties]], particularly the [[international sea treaty]].<ref name=Hudson/> Horner has also worked with other rightist policy groups—including the [[Center for Security Policy]], where he served on [[National Security Advisory Board]], and the [[Madison Center]] — and | + | '''Charles Horner''' is a senior fellow at the [[neoconservative]] [[Hudson Institute]], where he specializes in [[China]], international science and technology relations, and [[international treaties]], particularly the [[international sea treaty]].<ref name=Hudson/> Horner has also worked with other rightist policy groups—including the [[Center for Security Policy]], where he served on [[National Security Advisory Board]], and the [[Madison Center]] — and was a diplomat and adviser in both the [[Ronald Reagan]] and [[George H.W. Bush]] administrations.<ref name=Hudson>Hudson Institute, "Charles Horner," http://www.hudson.org/horner.</ref> In 2003 President Bush selected Horner, along with neoconservative ideologue [[Daniel Pipes]], to join the board of directors of the [[U.S. Institute of Peace]].<ref>US Institute for Peace, "Four New Members Join Board," US Institute for Peace, August/October 2003, http://web.archive.org/web/20090610074343/http://www.usip.org/peacewatch/2003/810/board.html.</ref> |
Horner's recent work includes the 2009 book Rising China and Its Postmodern Fate (University of Georgia Press), which appears to have been generally well accepted by experts in the field.<ref>See, for example, Andrew S. Erickson, review of Charles Horner, Rising China and Its Postmodern Fate: Memories of Empire in a New Global Context, Naval War College Review, 63.1 (Spring 2010): 145-47.</ref> According to one reviewer, the book “addresses the hot topic of China’s claim to ‘peaceful rise.’ Unlike other similarly titled books, it is more interested in analyzing what China’s rise means for Chinese than what it means for Western militaries and economies. Horner examines how ‘[[China]] is seeking to assemble a set of lessons from the country’s past that can serve as a guide … for China’s return to prominence… in the world.’ … In Horner’s analysis, the most un-Chinese period of Chinese history is the People’s Republic. [[Marxist-Leninist]]-[[Maoism]] was so Western and ‘so radical a departure from everything that had come before’ that ‘China and the PRC are not the same thing.’ The abandonment of [[Maoist]] radicalism along with the doctrine of [[People’s War]] makes the path of peaceful rise a ‘possibility.’”<ref>Victoria Tin-bor Hui, “Charles Horner, Rising China and Its Postmodern Fate: Memories of Empire in a New Global Context,” China Perspective, 2010/3, http://chinaperspectives.revues.org/5319.</ref> | Horner's recent work includes the 2009 book Rising China and Its Postmodern Fate (University of Georgia Press), which appears to have been generally well accepted by experts in the field.<ref>See, for example, Andrew S. Erickson, review of Charles Horner, Rising China and Its Postmodern Fate: Memories of Empire in a New Global Context, Naval War College Review, 63.1 (Spring 2010): 145-47.</ref> According to one reviewer, the book “addresses the hot topic of China’s claim to ‘peaceful rise.’ Unlike other similarly titled books, it is more interested in analyzing what China’s rise means for Chinese than what it means for Western militaries and economies. Horner examines how ‘[[China]] is seeking to assemble a set of lessons from the country’s past that can serve as a guide … for China’s return to prominence… in the world.’ … In Horner’s analysis, the most un-Chinese period of Chinese history is the People’s Republic. [[Marxist-Leninist]]-[[Maoism]] was so Western and ‘so radical a departure from everything that had come before’ that ‘China and the PRC are not the same thing.’ The abandonment of [[Maoist]] radicalism along with the doctrine of [[People’s War]] makes the path of peaceful rise a ‘possibility.’”<ref>Victoria Tin-bor Hui, “Charles Horner, Rising China and Its Postmodern Fate: Memories of Empire in a New Global Context,” China Perspective, 2010/3, http://chinaperspectives.revues.org/5319.</ref> |
Revision as of 23:23, 2 August 2022
Not to be confused with Chuck Horner the retired Air Force general and former head of the Air Force Space Command who was a member of the Rumsfeld Space Commission
Charles Horner (diplomat) | |
---|---|
Born | April 8, 1943 |
Alma mater | University of Pennsylvania, University of Chicago, National Taiwan University, Tokyo University |
Spouse | Constance Horner |
Member of | Center for Security Policy/National Security Advisory Council |
Interests | • Law of the Sea • UNCLOS • China |
On the staff of Senator Henry M. Jackson;neoconservative; wants China to be in conflict with the Islamic world. |
Charles Horner is a senior fellow at the neoconservative Hudson Institute, where he specializes in China, international science and technology relations, and international treaties, particularly the international sea treaty.[1] Horner has also worked with other rightist policy groups—including the Center for Security Policy, where he served on National Security Advisory Board, and the Madison Center — and was a diplomat and adviser in both the Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations.[1] In 2003 President Bush selected Horner, along with neoconservative ideologue Daniel Pipes, to join the board of directors of the U.S. Institute of Peace.[2]
Horner's recent work includes the 2009 book Rising China and Its Postmodern Fate (University of Georgia Press), which appears to have been generally well accepted by experts in the field.[3] According to one reviewer, the book “addresses the hot topic of China’s claim to ‘peaceful rise.’ Unlike other similarly titled books, it is more interested in analyzing what China’s rise means for Chinese than what it means for Western militaries and economies. Horner examines how ‘China is seeking to assemble a set of lessons from the country’s past that can serve as a guide … for China’s return to prominence… in the world.’ … In Horner’s analysis, the most un-Chinese period of Chinese history is the People’s Republic. Marxist-Leninist-Maoism was so Western and ‘so radical a departure from everything that had come before’ that ‘China and the PRC are not the same thing.’ The abandonment of Maoist radicalism along with the doctrine of People’s War makes the path of peaceful rise a ‘possibility.’”[4]
In a joint 2010 op-ed piece for the Wall Street Journal Asia with fellow Hudson scholar Eric Brown, Horner speculated that China’s domestic and foreign policies would inevitably draw it into conflict with the Islamic world. “[T]he more Beijing projects itself into the Muslim world, the more China encounters the Ineffable and the Other—the cultural, racial and religious power of Muslim civilization. One must wonder, based on Beijing's now persistent incapacity to deal effectively and wisely with its own Muslim subjects, how it will fare further afield. As for the Islamic world, the antipathy of some to ‘Western imperialism’ has become so conditioned a reflex that there is no actual thought in it at all. Now, the Muslim world is just getting to know Chinese power; we cannot yet assess how the East Asian arriviste will be received.”[5]
Before joining the Hudson Institute, Horner was president of the Madison Center, which in 1990 merged with the Institute for Educational Affairs (IEA) to become the Madison Center for Educational Affairs (MCEA). The IEA was founded by Irving Kristol, William Simon (former Treasury Secretary for presidents Nixon and Ford and president of the Olin Foundation), while the Madison Center was founded by William Bennett. Media Transparency reports that the MCEA "provides funds for right-wing research and conservative student newspapers." MCEA not only gets its funding from Olin, but also the Scaife, Smith Richardson, and J.M. Foundations.[6]
According to his Hudson bio, “In the administrations of President Reagan and the first President Bush, Horner served consecutively as Deputy Representative to the United Nations Conference on the Law of Sea, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Science and Technology, and Associate Director of the United States Information Agency. He is a recipient of the Department of State Superior Honor Award. From 1980 to 1982, Horner was Adjunct Professor in Georgetown University's School of Foreign Service, and also an associate of its Landegger Program in International Business Diplomacy. During the l970s, Horner served on the staff of the late Senator Henry M. Jackson (D.-Wash.) and then as Senior Legislative Assistant for Foreign Affairs and National Security policy to the late Senator Daniel P. Moynihan (D.-N.Y.) A graduate of the University of Pennsylvania, Horner also did graduate work in Chinese history at the University of Chicago and, overseas, from 1967 to 1970, at National Taiwan University and Tokyo University.”[1]
Horner has also been a member of the Secretary of State’s Advisory Committee on International Communications and Information Policy, the Secretary of Commerce’s Advisory Committee on the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the Voice of America Advisory Committee, and the Advisory Board of the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy.
References
- ↑ a b c Hudson Institute, "Charles Horner," http://www.hudson.org/horner.
- ↑ US Institute for Peace, "Four New Members Join Board," US Institute for Peace, August/October 2003, http://web.archive.org/web/20090610074343/http://www.usip.org/peacewatch/2003/810/board.html.
- ↑ See, for example, Andrew S. Erickson, review of Charles Horner, Rising China and Its Postmodern Fate: Memories of Empire in a New Global Context, Naval War College Review, 63.1 (Spring 2010): 145-47.
- ↑ Victoria Tin-bor Hui, “Charles Horner, Rising China and Its Postmodern Fate: Memories of Empire in a New Global Context,” China Perspective, 2010/3, http://chinaperspectives.revues.org/5319.
- ↑ Eric Brown and Charles Horner, “Beijing's Islamic Complex,” Wall Street Journal Asia, June 3, 2010, available at http://www.hudson.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=publication_details&id=7042.
- ↑ Madison Center for Educational Affairs, "Madison Center for Educational Affairs," Madison Center for Educational Affairs, [no date], http://web.archive.org/web/20041211022811/http://www.mediatransparency.org/recipients/madison_center.htm.
Militarist Monitor is not affiliated with Wikispooks. Original page source here